What do you think?
Rate this book
Friend of Science, Friend of Faith: Listening to God in His Works and Word
A scientist explores the harmony between Christian faith and science
Though some Christians and many skeptics see science and Christianity as locked in a never-ending battle, geologist Gregg Davidson contends that there is tremendous harmony between Scripture and modern science. Many apparent conflicts arise when the Bible is interpreted apart from its literary and historical contexts, but when these are taken into account, most alleged clashes resolve.
Proceeding from a belief that Scripture is inspired and without error and that God's creation should inform how we interpret the Bible, Davidson shows that Scripture and science need not disagree on issues like the age of the earth, Adam and Eve, Noah's flood, the origin and development of life, and numerous related topics. Rather, Christians can rejoice at how God's glory is revealed in both the Bible and the natural world.
A few more reviewer
"This is a book I will use to equip our congregation and educate our community..."
--Byron Townsend, Pastor, Grace Mid-City Church, Baton Rouge,LA
"...Davidson combines authentic science with biblical theology to take us beyond a simplistic view that one must choose either science or faith..."
--R. Joel Duff, Professor of Biology, Univ. of Akron
"...the overall presentation is powerful, and the science sections are about as clear and navigable for non-scientists as possible..."
--Kenneth J. Turner, Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Languages, Toccoa Falls College
"...the best book I have encountered for addressing the core questions at the intersection of geology and Christian faith...destined to become an essential resource for those ministering at the intersection of science and Christian faith..."
--Ken Wolgemuth, Founder, Solid Rock Lectures
" ... a handbook to guide the sincere student of science and Scripture to an honest settlement between the two...spans the waterfront of present issues, ignoring nothing important to the Christian..."
--Johnny V. Miller, Coauthor, In the Beginning, We Misunderstood
" ... a must read for anyone wishing to understand the theological and scientific issues pertaining to creation..."
--Davis A. Young, Coauthor of The Bible, Rocks, and Time
"...demonstrates that science and Scripture--when both are properly interpreted--display a remarkable congruence..."
--Ken Keathley, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
"...a refreshing read on an oft-debated topic...Christians interested in science-faith questions will want [this book] on their shelf."
--J.W. Wartick, Always Have a Reason , blog
"...an impressive capacity to describe how the insights of science and biblical faith come together..."
--Greg Cootsona, Author of Mere Science and Christian Faith
"...an incredibly helpful roadmap for thinking about science and Christian faith...this book will be invaluable in helping people to see that science and Christian faith can befriends, and need never be foes."
--Jeff Hardin, Chair of Integrative Biology, Univ. of Wisconsin
Though some Christians and many skeptics see science and Christianity as locked in a never-ending battle, geologist Gregg Davidson contends that there is tremendous harmony between Scripture and modern science. Many apparent conflicts arise when the Bible is interpreted apart from its literary and historical contexts, but when these are taken into account, most alleged clashes resolve.
Proceeding from a belief that Scripture is inspired and without error and that God's creation should inform how we interpret the Bible, Davidson shows that Scripture and science need not disagree on issues like the age of the earth, Adam and Eve, Noah's flood, the origin and development of life, and numerous related topics. Rather, Christians can rejoice at how God's glory is revealed in both the Bible and the natural world.
A few more reviewer
"This is a book I will use to equip our congregation and educate our community..."
--Byron Townsend, Pastor, Grace Mid-City Church, Baton Rouge,LA
"...Davidson combines authentic science with biblical theology to take us beyond a simplistic view that one must choose either science or faith..."
--R. Joel Duff, Professor of Biology, Univ. of Akron
"...the overall presentation is powerful, and the science sections are about as clear and navigable for non-scientists as possible..."
--Kenneth J. Turner, Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Languages, Toccoa Falls College
"...the best book I have encountered for addressing the core questions at the intersection of geology and Christian faith...destined to become an essential resource for those ministering at the intersection of science and Christian faith..."
--Ken Wolgemuth, Founder, Solid Rock Lectures
" ... a handbook to guide the sincere student of science and Scripture to an honest settlement between the two...spans the waterfront of present issues, ignoring nothing important to the Christian..."
--Johnny V. Miller, Coauthor, In the Beginning, We Misunderstood
" ... a must read for anyone wishing to understand the theological and scientific issues pertaining to creation..."
--Davis A. Young, Coauthor of The Bible, Rocks, and Time
"...demonstrates that science and Scripture--when both are properly interpreted--display a remarkable congruence..."
--Ken Keathley, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
"...a refreshing read on an oft-debated topic...Christians interested in science-faith questions will want [this book] on their shelf."
--J.W. Wartick, Always Have a Reason , blog
"...an impressive capacity to describe how the insights of science and biblical faith come together..."
--Greg Cootsona, Author of Mere Science and Christian Faith
"...an incredibly helpful roadmap for thinking about science and Christian faith...this book will be invaluable in helping people to see that science and Christian faith can befriends, and need never be foes."
--Jeff Hardin, Chair of Integrative Biology, Univ. of Wisconsin
304 pages, Paperback
Published November 19, 2019
9 people are currently reading
69 people want to read
About the author
Gregg Davidson
10 books2 followersGregg Davidson has been a professor of Geology & Geological Engineering since 1996, specializing in hydrology and geochemistry, and serving for many years as the department chair. His professional writing is divided between the purely scientific (usually tied in some way to water), and the intersection of science and Christian faith. On the strictly science side, he loves to get away from the office with some regularity, whether wading chest deep in a cypress swamp, or rushing to the levee when the mighty Mississippi spills over its banks. On matters of faith and science, Gregg has a passion for understanding and communicating the harmony (or at least lack of conflict) that exists between the Bible and modern science.
Gregg’s works of fiction are the product of an early morning routine that includes a hot mug of coffee and an hour of self-indulgent writing. No contracts or deadlines. Just the fun of starting with the barest idea of a story, and becoming a participant in the plot as it unfolds in unexpected ways.
Gregg’s works of fiction are the product of an early morning routine that includes a hot mug of coffee and an hour of self-indulgent writing. No contracts or deadlines. Just the fun of starting with the barest idea of a story, and becoming a participant in the plot as it unfolds in unexpected ways.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews
February 21, 2020
Summary: Shows how we can trust both the witness of scripture and the findings of science as we consider God’s works.
Gregg Davidson begins this account with a story I’ve sadly observed in too many college settings. A students has been raised with a particular interpretation of the Bible’s account of beginnings and all sorts of “answers” to the challenge of evolution. Then she discovers that the real evidence for evolution far more extensive, and that the supposed “objections” to evolution were groundless in light of the actual evidence. A well meaning youth minister brings by a book defending a literal, “plain sense” reading of Genesis, but the student finds it riddled with inconsistencies, misconceptions and false assertions. Forced to choose between science and the interpretation of scripture presented her as true and authoritative, she walked away from her faith, her Bible ending up in a landfill.
Davidson is saddened by this because he is convinced that most of the science versus faith conflicts are needless battles. He proposes three important questions where science and the Bible seem in conflict:
1. Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2. Does the science conflict with the intended message of scripture?
3. Is the science credible? (p.23).
What Davidson does is illustrate, first with the historic case of heliocentrism, and then in much more depth in the accounts of origins how Genesis may give a true, but not literalistic account of origins that would have “rung true” for it original hearers and readers who would have been baffled by the concordist efforts to reconcile a literal reading with observed evidence. He then shows that in fact science does not clash with the intended meaning of scripture that affirms a universe that emerged ex nihilo, life that arose from the earth, and humans from the dust of the ground, and the evidence of a massive flood in the known world of the Bible.
Having contended for the trustworthiness of biblical accounts, and that read in terms of their intended message, they needn’t conflict with science, Davidson, a geologist by training, turns to the question of the credibility of the science of beginnings, summarizing in wonderful detail both cosmological origins, and the geology and origins of life on earth. He shows the problems the evidence poses for flood geology. He also addresses the objection raised by many of the lack of transitional forms, demonstrating that while this was true at one point, we now have great evidence for these forms in the fossil record showing transitions from dinosaurs to birds, reptiles to mammals, mammals to marine whales, and the origins of human life.
One of the most challenging portions of this book for those who advocate “creation science” is how Davidson exposes the rhetorical moves used to advance this cause: false dichotomies, the twisting of terms, the misapplication of scientific principles like the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the misleading ways of telling half a story, the use of distractions, the cherry-picking of quotations, and outright wrong and often outdated information. Some do this from sincere conviction, and I appreciate Davidson’s graciousness with those who do not agree, and his commitment to Christian charity and fellowship with those who differ. But he also challenges others who uphold a particular mode of creation at the expense of truth. The cause of truth and righteousness is never advanced by falsehoods. Their efforts are also misdirected. They become creation evangelists, rather than what Davidson would hope for, people with particular beliefs of what is true who can acknowledge those who read Genesis differently and then say, “so what do you think about Jesus?”
He discusses the intelligent design movement, and the difficulty of arguing for the activity of God in the places evidencing design not yet explicable by science. He confirmed what I’ve long felt that the things we do understand argue as much for the Creator as what we do not, and that to put our emphasis on the inexplicables is to worship a shrinking God, rather than a God, the grandeur of whose work only grows as we understand more of it.
Gregg Davidson represents a growing number of Christians in science who are convinced both of the inspiration and authority of the Bible and the credibility of the results of scientific research. As his title suggests, he is an advocate for a better conversation, a better relationship between science and faith, a friendly rather than adversarial relationship. In this book he makes a strong case from both scripture and science that this is possible, and that adversarial approaches, whether by Christians, or by atheists like Richard Dawkins, are needless, wrong headed, and harmful.
There are people on both sides of the “battle” who have built personal followings and empires that are sustained by the perpetuation of this battle. I frankly hope that Davidson’s book contributes to the opening of the eyes of many to recognize that “the emperor(s) have no clothes,” that they should no longer be heeded, and that former enemies might become friends–friends both of science and faith.
________________________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher. The opinions I have expressed are my own.
Gregg Davidson begins this account with a story I’ve sadly observed in too many college settings. A students has been raised with a particular interpretation of the Bible’s account of beginnings and all sorts of “answers” to the challenge of evolution. Then she discovers that the real evidence for evolution far more extensive, and that the supposed “objections” to evolution were groundless in light of the actual evidence. A well meaning youth minister brings by a book defending a literal, “plain sense” reading of Genesis, but the student finds it riddled with inconsistencies, misconceptions and false assertions. Forced to choose between science and the interpretation of scripture presented her as true and authoritative, she walked away from her faith, her Bible ending up in a landfill.
Davidson is saddened by this because he is convinced that most of the science versus faith conflicts are needless battles. He proposes three important questions where science and the Bible seem in conflict:
1. Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2. Does the science conflict with the intended message of scripture?
3. Is the science credible? (p.23).
What Davidson does is illustrate, first with the historic case of heliocentrism, and then in much more depth in the accounts of origins how Genesis may give a true, but not literalistic account of origins that would have “rung true” for it original hearers and readers who would have been baffled by the concordist efforts to reconcile a literal reading with observed evidence. He then shows that in fact science does not clash with the intended meaning of scripture that affirms a universe that emerged ex nihilo, life that arose from the earth, and humans from the dust of the ground, and the evidence of a massive flood in the known world of the Bible.
Having contended for the trustworthiness of biblical accounts, and that read in terms of their intended message, they needn’t conflict with science, Davidson, a geologist by training, turns to the question of the credibility of the science of beginnings, summarizing in wonderful detail both cosmological origins, and the geology and origins of life on earth. He shows the problems the evidence poses for flood geology. He also addresses the objection raised by many of the lack of transitional forms, demonstrating that while this was true at one point, we now have great evidence for these forms in the fossil record showing transitions from dinosaurs to birds, reptiles to mammals, mammals to marine whales, and the origins of human life.
One of the most challenging portions of this book for those who advocate “creation science” is how Davidson exposes the rhetorical moves used to advance this cause: false dichotomies, the twisting of terms, the misapplication of scientific principles like the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the misleading ways of telling half a story, the use of distractions, the cherry-picking of quotations, and outright wrong and often outdated information. Some do this from sincere conviction, and I appreciate Davidson’s graciousness with those who do not agree, and his commitment to Christian charity and fellowship with those who differ. But he also challenges others who uphold a particular mode of creation at the expense of truth. The cause of truth and righteousness is never advanced by falsehoods. Their efforts are also misdirected. They become creation evangelists, rather than what Davidson would hope for, people with particular beliefs of what is true who can acknowledge those who read Genesis differently and then say, “so what do you think about Jesus?”
He discusses the intelligent design movement, and the difficulty of arguing for the activity of God in the places evidencing design not yet explicable by science. He confirmed what I’ve long felt that the things we do understand argue as much for the Creator as what we do not, and that to put our emphasis on the inexplicables is to worship a shrinking God, rather than a God, the grandeur of whose work only grows as we understand more of it.
Gregg Davidson represents a growing number of Christians in science who are convinced both of the inspiration and authority of the Bible and the credibility of the results of scientific research. As his title suggests, he is an advocate for a better conversation, a better relationship between science and faith, a friendly rather than adversarial relationship. In this book he makes a strong case from both scripture and science that this is possible, and that adversarial approaches, whether by Christians, or by atheists like Richard Dawkins, are needless, wrong headed, and harmful.
There are people on both sides of the “battle” who have built personal followings and empires that are sustained by the perpetuation of this battle. I frankly hope that Davidson’s book contributes to the opening of the eyes of many to recognize that “the emperor(s) have no clothes,” that they should no longer be heeded, and that former enemies might become friends–friends both of science and faith.
________________________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher. The opinions I have expressed are my own.
February 17, 2020
Gregg Davidson is a Christian and Geologist who is a frequent contributor to BioLogos.org. In this book, he makes the case that modern science and Christianity are not in conflict. You do not have to choose between scientific facts about the origins of the world and life and the claims of the biblical texts. He begins the book by telling the heartbreaking story of a college student named Riley who was brought up in a Christian home, inundated with young earth apologetics, then went off to college to become a scientist. Becoming disillusioned by the overwhelming evidence that the earth is much older than a few thousand years, and the evidence that humans share biological relation with the great apes and evolved from a common ape ancestor, she literally threw the Bible she took with her to college in the trash bin! Her story is not unique, but Davidson opens the book with this story to show just how much is at stake. Peoples’ eternal destinies are at stake!
Davidson seeks to answer three questions in his book:
1: Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2: Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture?
3: Is the science credible?
Very briefly, Davidson’s answers to these questions are:
1: The inerrancy of the Bible does not depend on the “literal” young-Earth interpretation being correct. The Bible is inerrant; the young-Earth interpretation is not.
2: God’s works in creation, understood through science, do not conflict with the explicit claims of God’s words in Scripture.
3: Old-Earth, evolutionary science makes credible claims about God’s creation, and most claims by young-Earth creationists are not consistent with what we observe in God’s creation.
Of course, Davidson has much more to say in answer to each of these three questions.
In the chapter titled “Nature and Biblical Inerrancy”, Davidson shows how the biblical texts’ descriptions of nature depict a dome-like cosmology which Israel shared with her neighbors. Followers of my blog on www.cerebralfaith.net will be well acquainted with this “Dome Cosmology” already. It’s all over The Bible, mentions of a solid firmament holding back waters, windows that open and shut to let down occasional rain, pillars that hold up the firmament, etc. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. And looking at old artistic depictions and literary descriptions of the world from Ancient Near Eastern texts, you find that this conception of the cosmos was common in the Ancient Near East. Some of the details differed (for example, the pagans believed many gods managed the cosmos whereas Israel believed the only one did. Babylon believed Marduk made the solid sky out of half of Tiamat’s body and the land with the other half of her body.) but the general picture was the same. Does this threaten biblical inerrancy? Only if you hold to what Davidson calls “Comprehensive Inerrancy”. Davidson’s definition of inerrancy is in accord with my own as well the Chicago’s statement; that The Bible is inerrant in all that it intends to teach and affirms. Well, if you think The Bible intends to teach ANE cosmology, then it’s wrong in a lot of places. By contrast, if The Bible is communicating theological and moral messages while making use of cosmological imagery familiar to the author and audience, meaning the ANE science is just background and incidental, then The Bible is not in error. So how do we know whether The Bible intends to instruct on how the heavens go in addition to how to go to Heaven? Davidson gives several arguments from the text. Get the book to find out what those are!
Davidson goes on to give a persuasive case for what is commonly known as The Framework Hypothesis. I do think a literary framework is part of the author’s intent, but as I explain in various writings of my own on Genesis 1, I think Genesis 1 is mainly teaching what God decreed each thing’s function would be, and the 7-day structure is God setting up the cosmos as His cosmic temple. But as Walton notes in The Lost World Of Genesis One, this view and The Framework Hypothesis aren’t mutually exclusive. Ergo, I need not disagree with Davidson on this point, but simply say that there’s more to it than he went into.
Davidson’s treatment of the scientific evidence for an old earth and evolution are very accessible to the layman. One need not fear getting bogged down by technical jargon (or what I like to call “Scientist babble”). This book was written at the popular level. I think Davidson makes a compelling case for an evolutionary view of creationism.
Davidson seeks to answer three questions in his book:
1: Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2: Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture?
3: Is the science credible?
Very briefly, Davidson’s answers to these questions are:
1: The inerrancy of the Bible does not depend on the “literal” young-Earth interpretation being correct. The Bible is inerrant; the young-Earth interpretation is not.
2: God’s works in creation, understood through science, do not conflict with the explicit claims of God’s words in Scripture.
3: Old-Earth, evolutionary science makes credible claims about God’s creation, and most claims by young-Earth creationists are not consistent with what we observe in God’s creation.
Of course, Davidson has much more to say in answer to each of these three questions.
In the chapter titled “Nature and Biblical Inerrancy”, Davidson shows how the biblical texts’ descriptions of nature depict a dome-like cosmology which Israel shared with her neighbors. Followers of my blog on www.cerebralfaith.net will be well acquainted with this “Dome Cosmology” already. It’s all over The Bible, mentions of a solid firmament holding back waters, windows that open and shut to let down occasional rain, pillars that hold up the firmament, etc. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. And looking at old artistic depictions and literary descriptions of the world from Ancient Near Eastern texts, you find that this conception of the cosmos was common in the Ancient Near East. Some of the details differed (for example, the pagans believed many gods managed the cosmos whereas Israel believed the only one did. Babylon believed Marduk made the solid sky out of half of Tiamat’s body and the land with the other half of her body.) but the general picture was the same. Does this threaten biblical inerrancy? Only if you hold to what Davidson calls “Comprehensive Inerrancy”. Davidson’s definition of inerrancy is in accord with my own as well the Chicago’s statement; that The Bible is inerrant in all that it intends to teach and affirms. Well, if you think The Bible intends to teach ANE cosmology, then it’s wrong in a lot of places. By contrast, if The Bible is communicating theological and moral messages while making use of cosmological imagery familiar to the author and audience, meaning the ANE science is just background and incidental, then The Bible is not in error. So how do we know whether The Bible intends to instruct on how the heavens go in addition to how to go to Heaven? Davidson gives several arguments from the text. Get the book to find out what those are!
Davidson goes on to give a persuasive case for what is commonly known as The Framework Hypothesis. I do think a literary framework is part of the author’s intent, but as I explain in various writings of my own on Genesis 1, I think Genesis 1 is mainly teaching what God decreed each thing’s function would be, and the 7-day structure is God setting up the cosmos as His cosmic temple. But as Walton notes in The Lost World Of Genesis One, this view and The Framework Hypothesis aren’t mutually exclusive. Ergo, I need not disagree with Davidson on this point, but simply say that there’s more to it than he went into.
Davidson’s treatment of the scientific evidence for an old earth and evolution are very accessible to the layman. One need not fear getting bogged down by technical jargon (or what I like to call “Scientist babble”). This book was written at the popular level. I think Davidson makes a compelling case for an evolutionary view of creationism.
December 7, 2019
A great book to connect some dots that show science and faith are not at odds and can coexist in harmony. Insightful answers are given to some difficult questions. It is well written and can be understood by any lay person. From the opening scenario in “setting the stage” it is gripping and approaches the issues in a way that’s relatable to the personal experiences of many people. This is a must read for anyone who is on this journey of reconciliation. I am hoping for, and look forward to more literary endeavors from this author.
May 1, 2020
Friend of Science, Friend of Faith: Listening to God in His Works and Word by Gregg Davidson
Review by G. Alford
Gregg Davidson in his book Friend of Science, Friend of Faith shows how he is a friend of both, and how anyone taking the time to consider the material that he presents can likewise be a “friend of Science” and a “Friend of Faith”. The subtitle suggest the direction the book will take when we read: “Listening to God in his Works and Word.”
It is unfortunate that in this day and age any believer should be deluded to think that there would ever be a conflict between the truth of God’s word and the truth revealed in God’s works. But it is the fact that there are those who promote an either/or view and they also tend to be ones making the loudest noises and getting the “popular press” in too many “Evangelical” churches. Thus before Gregg can proceed at all he has to address the issue and he does so in Part 1 under the heading: “Conflicts New and Old”.
The first chapter then is called “Setting the stage---Crisis of Faith” and in it he sets the scenario of a college student facing this false dichotomy of either “what the Bible teaches” (according to what her church has taught) or what she is learning about “evolution” according to the science facts that are being presented.
In this context then the author says that the objectives of the book are two-fold.
1. “The first is to develop a general approach for addressing apparent conflicts wherever they may arise, in a way that honors Scripture and honestly engages science. “
2. “…is to apply the approach to the current discord on origins to see what may be learned.”
For the most part, the titles of each part or section along with the chapter headings will give the gist of what is developed.
For instance chapter 2 continuing in “Conflicts New and Old” is simply titled: “Historical Context--- Heliocentrism vs. Scripture”.
Part 2 then in addressing “The Meaning of Scripture” looks at chapters 3 through 5 under the following: “Nature and Biblical Inerrancy”, Beginnings--- Matthew and Genesis, and then Genesis --- Inside and out.”
Part 3 asks the question: “Conflict?” and answers “Does Modern Science Conflict withScripture?” under sub headings: “The Origin of the Universe: Ex Nihilo”; “The Origin of Life: ‘Brought Forth from the Earth’; “The Origin of Man: ‘Dust from the Ground’”; “Death and the Fall”; “Noah’s Flood”; and “Genealogies and the Time Since Creation”.
Part 4 under the heading: “The Credibility of Modern Science” takes up 4 chapters to address “Confusing Science and Philosophy”; “Questions of Age---Universe and Earth”; “Evolution and the Origin of Life”; and then “Origin of Man”.
While Dr. Davidson has had to face the presentations of Young Earth Creationism and anti-evolutionary thought throughout it is in the final part, “War of Words” that he has to get very particular as he looks at how these schools of interpretation use, or misuse terms. So chapter 11 speaks about “Creation Science---Behind the Curtain”. Chapter 12 outlines the “Dawn of the Young-Earth Evolutionist”. Chapter 13 looks at the attempt to dress up “religion” or “philosophy as science under the chapter heading: “What about Intelligent Design?”
He closes the book by appealing to an “Opening Doors” and brings us back to the college student and her “dilemma” and how churches and preacher/teachers might work to solve this supposed conflict and encourage resolution so that we might have strong people of faith working in the field of science to advance this noble goal of Listening to God in His Works and Word.
My impression as a lay person reading through this book was that Gregg Davidson first of all sets out to tell his reader what he is going to say. Then he presents all the facts with very detailed visual illustrations and clear verbal descriptions, and then he gives a summary and restates the major points in abbreviated form.
My further impression is that he makes his presentation clear enough that any layperson who has an interest at all in understanding the Scriptures and Science, while they may have to think and ‘work at connecting the dots” should not suppose that they are in any position to argue against evolution or to promote Young-Earth Creationism if they cannot follow his presentation at this level.
I guess that if I were to say it as clearly as I would like I would say that anyone who defends YEC or goes on an anti-evolution rant or crusade but cannot grasp ---and accept --- the evidences presented here, they really have “no business” even opening their mouth as though they have any basis for “argument” or “discussion”.
Dr. Davidson is too kind to say this in so many words but I declare that YECism verges on cultic dogmatism and I would hope that this book would serve to “rescue” those caught in its web. His footnotes and bibliography are extensive and there is no reason why any honest seeker after truth could not follow up with their own research or confirmation that his quotes are “in context” and factual.
Review by G. Alford
Gregg Davidson in his book Friend of Science, Friend of Faith shows how he is a friend of both, and how anyone taking the time to consider the material that he presents can likewise be a “friend of Science” and a “Friend of Faith”. The subtitle suggest the direction the book will take when we read: “Listening to God in his Works and Word.”
It is unfortunate that in this day and age any believer should be deluded to think that there would ever be a conflict between the truth of God’s word and the truth revealed in God’s works. But it is the fact that there are those who promote an either/or view and they also tend to be ones making the loudest noises and getting the “popular press” in too many “Evangelical” churches. Thus before Gregg can proceed at all he has to address the issue and he does so in Part 1 under the heading: “Conflicts New and Old”.
The first chapter then is called “Setting the stage---Crisis of Faith” and in it he sets the scenario of a college student facing this false dichotomy of either “what the Bible teaches” (according to what her church has taught) or what she is learning about “evolution” according to the science facts that are being presented.
In this context then the author says that the objectives of the book are two-fold.
1. “The first is to develop a general approach for addressing apparent conflicts wherever they may arise, in a way that honors Scripture and honestly engages science. “
2. “…is to apply the approach to the current discord on origins to see what may be learned.”
For the most part, the titles of each part or section along with the chapter headings will give the gist of what is developed.
For instance chapter 2 continuing in “Conflicts New and Old” is simply titled: “Historical Context--- Heliocentrism vs. Scripture”.
Part 2 then in addressing “The Meaning of Scripture” looks at chapters 3 through 5 under the following: “Nature and Biblical Inerrancy”, Beginnings--- Matthew and Genesis, and then Genesis --- Inside and out.”
Part 3 asks the question: “Conflict?” and answers “Does Modern Science Conflict withScripture?” under sub headings: “The Origin of the Universe: Ex Nihilo”; “The Origin of Life: ‘Brought Forth from the Earth’; “The Origin of Man: ‘Dust from the Ground’”; “Death and the Fall”; “Noah’s Flood”; and “Genealogies and the Time Since Creation”.
Part 4 under the heading: “The Credibility of Modern Science” takes up 4 chapters to address “Confusing Science and Philosophy”; “Questions of Age---Universe and Earth”; “Evolution and the Origin of Life”; and then “Origin of Man”.
While Dr. Davidson has had to face the presentations of Young Earth Creationism and anti-evolutionary thought throughout it is in the final part, “War of Words” that he has to get very particular as he looks at how these schools of interpretation use, or misuse terms. So chapter 11 speaks about “Creation Science---Behind the Curtain”. Chapter 12 outlines the “Dawn of the Young-Earth Evolutionist”. Chapter 13 looks at the attempt to dress up “religion” or “philosophy as science under the chapter heading: “What about Intelligent Design?”
He closes the book by appealing to an “Opening Doors” and brings us back to the college student and her “dilemma” and how churches and preacher/teachers might work to solve this supposed conflict and encourage resolution so that we might have strong people of faith working in the field of science to advance this noble goal of Listening to God in His Works and Word.
My impression as a lay person reading through this book was that Gregg Davidson first of all sets out to tell his reader what he is going to say. Then he presents all the facts with very detailed visual illustrations and clear verbal descriptions, and then he gives a summary and restates the major points in abbreviated form.
My further impression is that he makes his presentation clear enough that any layperson who has an interest at all in understanding the Scriptures and Science, while they may have to think and ‘work at connecting the dots” should not suppose that they are in any position to argue against evolution or to promote Young-Earth Creationism if they cannot follow his presentation at this level.
I guess that if I were to say it as clearly as I would like I would say that anyone who defends YEC or goes on an anti-evolution rant or crusade but cannot grasp ---and accept --- the evidences presented here, they really have “no business” even opening their mouth as though they have any basis for “argument” or “discussion”.
Dr. Davidson is too kind to say this in so many words but I declare that YECism verges on cultic dogmatism and I would hope that this book would serve to “rescue” those caught in its web. His footnotes and bibliography are extensive and there is no reason why any honest seeker after truth could not follow up with their own research or confirmation that his quotes are “in context” and factual.
December 8, 2019
I have read about 100 books on the intersection of science and faith. This is one of the very best. This book is well written, clear, and understandable for the non-scientist and typical lay person. Even more importantly, the tone is gracious, respectful, biblical, and filled with wisdom. I have already bought several additional copies to give as Christmas gifts. The book is divided into 5 parts. Here’s a little about each section:
Part 1: Conflict New & Old
The book opens looking at a common current day scenario and comparing it with times in the past where there has been conflict between science and faith. It is useful to see how historical conflicts were resolved in order to learn how we can benefit from past experiences. Three questions were raised that the rest of the book addresses:
1) Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2) Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture?
3) Is the science credible?
Part 2: The Meaning of Scripture
The 3 chapters in this section address the first question. The way the author addresses this question is a genuine strength of the book. He takes the Bible seriously and it is clear his first priority is to understand and explain Scripture accurately and faithfully. He carefully examines multiple passages in the Old Testament and New Testament and using Scripture to interpret Scripture he builds a solid case that the framework view of Genesis 1 is faithful to the text and consistent with the rest of Scripture, independent of what any modern science states.
Part 3: Conflict?
This section of the book addresses the question “Does modern science conflict with Scripture?” The purpose here is to look at if the current scientific understanding of a variety of topics fits or clashes with Scripture’s intended meaning. The author dives into the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the origin of humanity, death & the fall, the flood in Genesis, and genealogies & time. I liked how tables were used to succinctly show the Biblical claims with the scientific findings to see where further study is needed.
Part 4: The Credibility of Modern Science
I especially appreciated how the author takes the time to define his terms (both in this section and throughout the book). Some words in this conversation are fraught with multiple definitions and can be confusing. His definitions seemed fair and his consistent use of terminology facilitated clear communication. In addition to precisely defining terms, he points out the limits of science and cautions against confusing philosophical allegations with scientific assertions.
Chapters in this section explore the scientific understanding of the age of the universe, the age of the earth, evolution, the origin of life, and the origin of humanity. This is a delightful section and it was exciting to hear more about what is being discovered and learned in the scientific community.
Part 5: War of Words
Next, the author examines some of the claims of young earth advocates. He classifies the statements into several categories and addresses them by category, including several common examples. There is a chapter discussing the Intelligent Design movement too. The final chapter summarizes a few high-level thoughts and consequences of seeing science and Scripture in conflict and then recommends a better way; prioritizing Jesus. I love how it ends and my favorite statement in the book is in the concluding chapter where the author shares how an evangelist friend of his responds to questions about origins: “Here are 4 views Christians take on origins – let’s talk about Jesus.”
Disclosure: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for my honest review. I have not met the author.
Part 1: Conflict New & Old
The book opens looking at a common current day scenario and comparing it with times in the past where there has been conflict between science and faith. It is useful to see how historical conflicts were resolved in order to learn how we can benefit from past experiences. Three questions were raised that the rest of the book addresses:
1) Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question?
2) Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture?
3) Is the science credible?
Part 2: The Meaning of Scripture
The 3 chapters in this section address the first question. The way the author addresses this question is a genuine strength of the book. He takes the Bible seriously and it is clear his first priority is to understand and explain Scripture accurately and faithfully. He carefully examines multiple passages in the Old Testament and New Testament and using Scripture to interpret Scripture he builds a solid case that the framework view of Genesis 1 is faithful to the text and consistent with the rest of Scripture, independent of what any modern science states.
Part 3: Conflict?
This section of the book addresses the question “Does modern science conflict with Scripture?” The purpose here is to look at if the current scientific understanding of a variety of topics fits or clashes with Scripture’s intended meaning. The author dives into the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the origin of humanity, death & the fall, the flood in Genesis, and genealogies & time. I liked how tables were used to succinctly show the Biblical claims with the scientific findings to see where further study is needed.
Part 4: The Credibility of Modern Science
I especially appreciated how the author takes the time to define his terms (both in this section and throughout the book). Some words in this conversation are fraught with multiple definitions and can be confusing. His definitions seemed fair and his consistent use of terminology facilitated clear communication. In addition to precisely defining terms, he points out the limits of science and cautions against confusing philosophical allegations with scientific assertions.
Chapters in this section explore the scientific understanding of the age of the universe, the age of the earth, evolution, the origin of life, and the origin of humanity. This is a delightful section and it was exciting to hear more about what is being discovered and learned in the scientific community.
Part 5: War of Words
Next, the author examines some of the claims of young earth advocates. He classifies the statements into several categories and addresses them by category, including several common examples. There is a chapter discussing the Intelligent Design movement too. The final chapter summarizes a few high-level thoughts and consequences of seeing science and Scripture in conflict and then recommends a better way; prioritizing Jesus. I love how it ends and my favorite statement in the book is in the concluding chapter where the author shares how an evangelist friend of his responds to questions about origins: “Here are 4 views Christians take on origins – let’s talk about Jesus.”
Disclosure: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for my honest review. I have not met the author.
February 1, 2020
Gregg Davidson has two objectives for this book: (1) “to develop a general approach for addressing apparent conflicts whenever they may arise, in a way that honors Scripture and honestly engages science,” and (2) “to apply the approach to the current discord to see what may be learned.” He succeeds very well.
He proposes three questions that can be asked when a scientific theory appears to conflict with Scripture: (1) Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question? (2) Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture? and (3) Is the science credible? Davidson then spends the bulk of his book answering these questions in a systematic manner.
One of the topics that Davidson mentions is that although “population genetics points to an ancient common human ancestor, universal genealogical ancestry could have been more recent.” (p.91) This possibility is the topic of the 2019 book “The Genealogical Adam & Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry” by S. Joshua Swamidass.
Davidson then spends two chapters (11 & 12) clearly describing what is wrong with the tactics of Young Earth Creationism (YEC) and how they can be a barrier rather than a gateway to faith in Christ. In his discussion of them, he categorizes them as: (1) building false dichotomies, (2) twisting the meaning of terms, (3) misapplying scientific principles, (4) telling half a story, (5) creating distractions, (6) cherry-picking quotations, (7) arm-waving as a form of argument, and (8) flat-out wrong. If that sounds strong, it is.
He suggests that this comes about from “a failure to recognize the difference between God’s Word and one’s interpretation of that Word” and a shift in worship “from the Creator to the mode of creation.”
Chapter 13 is devoted to a discussion of the theological and scientific pitfalls of Intelligent Design.
In the end, Davidson concludes that it would be better to show how much Scripture and science have in common: a beginning to the universe, the earth bringing forth life, the incredible artistry of life adapted through time, and how nature proclaims the glory of its Author.
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in either side of the young earth-old earth, creation-evolution dialogue.
He proposes three questions that can be asked when a scientific theory appears to conflict with Scripture: (1) Does the infallibility of Scripture rest on a literal interpretation of the verses in question? (2) Does the science conflict with the intended message of Scripture? and (3) Is the science credible? Davidson then spends the bulk of his book answering these questions in a systematic manner.
One of the topics that Davidson mentions is that although “population genetics points to an ancient common human ancestor, universal genealogical ancestry could have been more recent.” (p.91) This possibility is the topic of the 2019 book “The Genealogical Adam & Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry” by S. Joshua Swamidass.
Davidson then spends two chapters (11 & 12) clearly describing what is wrong with the tactics of Young Earth Creationism (YEC) and how they can be a barrier rather than a gateway to faith in Christ. In his discussion of them, he categorizes them as: (1) building false dichotomies, (2) twisting the meaning of terms, (3) misapplying scientific principles, (4) telling half a story, (5) creating distractions, (6) cherry-picking quotations, (7) arm-waving as a form of argument, and (8) flat-out wrong. If that sounds strong, it is.
He suggests that this comes about from “a failure to recognize the difference between God’s Word and one’s interpretation of that Word” and a shift in worship “from the Creator to the mode of creation.”
Chapter 13 is devoted to a discussion of the theological and scientific pitfalls of Intelligent Design.
In the end, Davidson concludes that it would be better to show how much Scripture and science have in common: a beginning to the universe, the earth bringing forth life, the incredible artistry of life adapted through time, and how nature proclaims the glory of its Author.
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in either side of the young earth-old earth, creation-evolution dialogue.
January 23, 2020
Gregg Davidson PhD is a scientist—in particular a geologist—and a Christian. He believes in an ancient world, evolution, and Scripture. And he brings these beliefs into perfect harmony in this science-and-people-friendly book. The science is very real, with enough explanation and diagrams to satisfy a moderately real scientist from a moderately different area of expertise. Meanwhile the examples and illustrations are perfectly keyed to draw in readers with readers of many different backgrounds. The book is a moderately easy and truly thought-provoking read, whatever your science or faith position.
Clever analogies invite the reader to see things in different ways. Intriguing diagrams add immediacy to tables and examples. Fascinating historical details add depth to modern debates about faith and science, creation and evolution, and more, frequently giving answers to questions this reader, for one, has always wondered about. I love how the author’s well-chosen illustrations make the complexities of serious calculations both readily accessible and truly exciting.
At the end of the book, the author addresses particular arguments made against evolution and an “old earth.” Giving space to the arguments allows the reader to effectively listen in on a debate. Giving answers to them prepares the reader to answer those disagreements we so often hear from neighbors and friends.
Science is real, and so is faith. The author gives well-argued answers to wrong interpretations of science, and well-reasoned direction to our interpretation of Scripture. The net result is a scientifically rigorous view of the world God created, meshing perfectly with theology, faith and hope. Concluding that “Truth never needs to fear the open discussion of ideas,” the author offers wise answers for those young Christian students of science who suddenly find the world might not be as they imagined—instead, it works and changes exactly how God created it to do!
Disclosure: I was given a copy of this book and I’m now recommending it to all my Christian friends, whether or not they accept evolution and an old earth, in hopes that perhaps they will recommend it to their scientist children and grandchildren.
Clever analogies invite the reader to see things in different ways. Intriguing diagrams add immediacy to tables and examples. Fascinating historical details add depth to modern debates about faith and science, creation and evolution, and more, frequently giving answers to questions this reader, for one, has always wondered about. I love how the author’s well-chosen illustrations make the complexities of serious calculations both readily accessible and truly exciting.
At the end of the book, the author addresses particular arguments made against evolution and an “old earth.” Giving space to the arguments allows the reader to effectively listen in on a debate. Giving answers to them prepares the reader to answer those disagreements we so often hear from neighbors and friends.
Science is real, and so is faith. The author gives well-argued answers to wrong interpretations of science, and well-reasoned direction to our interpretation of Scripture. The net result is a scientifically rigorous view of the world God created, meshing perfectly with theology, faith and hope. Concluding that “Truth never needs to fear the open discussion of ideas,” the author offers wise answers for those young Christian students of science who suddenly find the world might not be as they imagined—instead, it works and changes exactly how God created it to do!
Disclosure: I was given a copy of this book and I’m now recommending it to all my Christian friends, whether or not they accept evolution and an old earth, in hopes that perhaps they will recommend it to their scientist children and grandchildren.
December 14, 2019
Gregg Davidson’s book, “Friend of Science, Friend of Faith” is a must read for those interested in origins and the Bible. He brings a very important perspective to the table. I think of the discussions that I commonly see where you can imagine a table with people there that represent different perspectives. We have a number of theologians and Bible scholars, biologists, and astronomers. Often, they make statements about geology, but rarely have the expertise to really understand this area. Some writers from a “young earth” perspective tend to write off geologists as a group who have “sold out” to atheists. Davidson brings a critical perspective. He has spent the time to really dig into God’s word. He challenges many of the popular “Sunday school” interpretations, showing that they are totally inconsistent with the Bible. He challenges the Young earth and “flood geology” interpretations, by in effect asking, “can you really interpret the Bible consistent with this model and their artificial demands for literal, plain reading in some areas and figurative interpretation in others.
He is able to explain geology in a way that makes it accessible to the non-geologists reading. He gently decimates many of the arguments for a young earth. He also brings important information to bear on key questions such as historical Adam and Noah and the issue of evolution in life. This will be a book that I will go back to many times in the future and will be recommending to my friends who want to keep their faith and science consistent.
He is able to explain geology in a way that makes it accessible to the non-geologists reading. He gently decimates many of the arguments for a young earth. He also brings important information to bear on key questions such as historical Adam and Noah and the issue of evolution in life. This will be a book that I will go back to many times in the future and will be recommending to my friends who want to keep their faith and science consistent.
July 5, 2021
This book was gifted to me by the author in exchange for a promise to write an honest review.
It was not an easy book to read. It took me over a year. As an intelligent, but non-scientific person, about 20% was over my head, but that's ok. The other 80% got the point across. It turned my head inside out. Jaw dropping revelations have forever changed my thinking. Some will be offended by this book. I encourage you to read it with an open mind and open heart. Be willing to admit you were wrong, learn from it and move on.
I still have a ton to process before I figure out what the heck I believe now, but two things I know 1) I am smarter. I am more aware of the mountain of evidence in science for evolution. Sheesh, I can't believe Im saying this. I am no longer burying my head in the sand. 2) My faith in God, and the authority of the Bible is stonger than ever. Truth always shows itself true. Increased knowldge poses no threat.
To paraphrase the author, I would love to live to see the day when young earth vs old earth is no longer a point of contention in the church, and a stumbling block for faith in the Bible. You can help bring this about by reading this book and sharing your knowledge with others. It's ok to skim past the parts that you can't understand. I did. I think I need to read it again, and will get even more out of it.
It was not an easy book to read. It took me over a year. As an intelligent, but non-scientific person, about 20% was over my head, but that's ok. The other 80% got the point across. It turned my head inside out. Jaw dropping revelations have forever changed my thinking. Some will be offended by this book. I encourage you to read it with an open mind and open heart. Be willing to admit you were wrong, learn from it and move on.
I still have a ton to process before I figure out what the heck I believe now, but two things I know 1) I am smarter. I am more aware of the mountain of evidence in science for evolution. Sheesh, I can't believe Im saying this. I am no longer burying my head in the sand. 2) My faith in God, and the authority of the Bible is stonger than ever. Truth always shows itself true. Increased knowldge poses no threat.
To paraphrase the author, I would love to live to see the day when young earth vs old earth is no longer a point of contention in the church, and a stumbling block for faith in the Bible. You can help bring this about by reading this book and sharing your knowledge with others. It's ok to skim past the parts that you can't understand. I did. I think I need to read it again, and will get even more out of it.
January 24, 2020
I have always enjoyed reading books about the harmony that exists between science and faith and also books about the apparent conflict between the two. As a result, I have quite a collection of books on this topic. That said, Friend of Science, Friend of Faith is now among my favorites. Gregg Davidson covers a lot of territory and helps the reader understand how to properly interpret Scripture and better understand the findings of science. In his chapter summary of “Does Modern Science Conflict with Scripture?” Davidson states; “Whenever Scripture touches on nature, it does so using the understanding of people at the time to communicate truth about the kingdom of God. We find nothing in Scripture that instructs us on the nature of nature, with one notable exception. We do find words that tell us to expect that nature reflects the character of its Creator.” Davidson does a remarkable job pointing this out throughout the book and I found it quite helpful.
Read
December 10, 2019This is an outstanding book, perhaps the best I've read on the subject. The author provides a very methodical, logical means of making his case. You want to apply your hermeneutic to support the young earth position? OK, but it falls apart once Gregg applies other examples of this literalism to show it is not consistent. Scripture is provided to show how the bible fits with modern science. Another section shows what modern science tells us in the various fields, and illuminates the dishonesty employed by those is the YEC camp to dismiss the overwhelming evidence to support an old earth and evolution. Well worth the read.
January 2, 2023
I'm so glad this book exists, and it was well-done, but it did mess with me! Before reading this book, I didn't consider myself "young earth" and I knew that things evolved, but I didn't understand the extent that they evolve. And man, my brain is kind of spinning with the implications of the author's position. I do agree with much of what I could understand from the book (I'll admit that, as a non-science-minded person, even the layman's terms and descriptions were a bit over my head!), but I don't think I could necessarily defend this position very well on my own. I'm glad I put this on my priority-to-read list because I don't think I would have read it otherwise.
January 25, 2020
This book addresses some of the vital questions that many Christians have. The author, being a fine teacher of earth science (not just a researcher) has answered these questions in a very effective way, if the book is read with an open mind. To many, the question of the age of the earth and origin of humans is more of a belief than an understanding, owing to improper understanding of the scriptures. This book is not only a good read for individuals but a good book to study by small groups in the church.
July 27, 2025
Honestly life changing, I've never read anything like it.
July 17, 2024
Friend of Science, Friend of Faith begins with a story of a college student taking science classes and realizing that what she’s been told by her parents and youth minister about science was not at all accurate. This is a common story to which many Christians and ex-Christians can relate. Some blame this issue on unwillingness to believe what God says in the Bible, and some blame it on taking specific interpretations of the Bible as God’s word. Gregg Davidson, Christian and Chair of Geology and Geological Engineering at the University of Mississippi, addresses this issue by first developing a general approach for how to resolve the apparent conflict between Scripture and science, and second by applying this approach to origins science.
Are the early chapters of Genesis intended to be taken literally, and does the infallibility of the Bible depend on a literal interpretation? Davidson walks through Genesis 1 and 2, looking at clues to help determine the answer. Later, he goes through the major topics of Genesis 1-11. For each one, he looks at the intended message of the Bible, what the current science says, and a synthesis of the two. Finally, he looks at the credibility of the science in question, addressing the age of the earth and universe, as well as evolution and the origin of life and man. He looks at the fossil record and geologic column, comparing current scientific explanations with common global flood explanations.
After seeing how the Bible and current science are not in conflict, Davidson pulls back the curtain on young earth creationism. He explains some of the tactics used by leaders and scientists of the movement. He discusses how the young earth movement is now moving more and more towards evolution, though it’s a hyperspeed version that isn’t scientifically realistic. And he looks at Intelligent Design and the theological and scientific pitfalls of that movement.
In the last chapter, Davidson demonstrates the consequences of rejecting modern science. As someone who has personally been affected by this manufactured conflict between faith and science, I enjoyed this book. It was helpful for me to see the issues all laid out in one place with such a thorough look at how to resolve the apparent conflicts and what possible objections might be. I highly recommend this book!
Disclaimer: I was given a complementary copy of this book in exchange for writing an honest review.
Are the early chapters of Genesis intended to be taken literally, and does the infallibility of the Bible depend on a literal interpretation? Davidson walks through Genesis 1 and 2, looking at clues to help determine the answer. Later, he goes through the major topics of Genesis 1-11. For each one, he looks at the intended message of the Bible, what the current science says, and a synthesis of the two. Finally, he looks at the credibility of the science in question, addressing the age of the earth and universe, as well as evolution and the origin of life and man. He looks at the fossil record and geologic column, comparing current scientific explanations with common global flood explanations.
After seeing how the Bible and current science are not in conflict, Davidson pulls back the curtain on young earth creationism. He explains some of the tactics used by leaders and scientists of the movement. He discusses how the young earth movement is now moving more and more towards evolution, though it’s a hyperspeed version that isn’t scientifically realistic. And he looks at Intelligent Design and the theological and scientific pitfalls of that movement.
In the last chapter, Davidson demonstrates the consequences of rejecting modern science. As someone who has personally been affected by this manufactured conflict between faith and science, I enjoyed this book. It was helpful for me to see the issues all laid out in one place with such a thorough look at how to resolve the apparent conflicts and what possible objections might be. I highly recommend this book!
Disclaimer: I was given a complementary copy of this book in exchange for writing an honest review.
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews