Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society

Rate this book
Book by Heesterman, J. C.

266 pages, Paperback

First published February 1, 1985

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

J.C. Heesterman

4 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (20%)
4 stars
1 (20%)
3 stars
3 (60%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Richard.
735 reviews32 followers
January 15, 2016
Fat bunch of learning in this here book. Old school.
Profile Image for Elzira Rai.
121 reviews
May 10, 2026
Two reservations temper my appreciation of this otherwise brilliant collection of essays. First, Heesterman's conjectures regarding the transition from an agonistic ritual model grounded in interdependence and reciprocity to an individualized yajamāna system are as erudite as they are unconvincing, resting on thin evidence and precarious assumptions about largely unintelligible materials. Second, these essays devote excessive attention to Dumont and the role of renunciation in Indian thought, with the effect (if not the explicit intent) of downplaying kingly power and authority. Much of Heesterman's analysis is structured around a reformulation of Dumont's theory of encompassment (and even anticipates something akin to a theory of "substantialization"), accepting the premise that Brahminical authority derives its legitimacy from a sphere beyond society — a framework that reproduces, rather than interrogates, the ideological self-representation of Brahminical tradition. Heesterman’s insightful forays into early modern and modern history could have provided ample material for testing such self-representations against historical realities beyond Brahminical literature, but these possibilities remain largely unexplored. The irony is thus hard to miss: a scholar who devoted his life to exploring the inner contradictions of Brahminical tradition proves reluctant, perhaps as a corollary of the premise that this tradition lies beyond society, to explore the contradictions between such self-representations and the weight of historical materials.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews