Rediscovering the Integral Cosmos: Physics, Metaphysics, and Vertical Causality

by Jean Borella, Wolfgang Smith

When a physicist who becomes a metaphysician, and a metaphysician who studies physics, join together to deal philosophically with science (quantum physics and cosmogenesis in particular), explosive results might well be expected—and this pivotal text does not disappoint. Co-author Jean Borella, professor of philosophy and metaphysics, also earned a degree in physics. And in co-author Wolfgang Smith we have a professor of mathematics and physics who became a metaphysician. Smith explores the implications of what he terms “vertical causality,” a hitherto unrecognized mode of causation which proves to be the missing ingredient needed to make sense out of quantum physics. He explains how vertical causality brings to light the long-forgotten fact that the integral cosmos replicates the corpus/anima/spiritus constitution of man; and, moreover, that this cosmic trichotomy proves essential both to a recovery of traditional cosmology and to the advancement of contemporary science. Finally, he shows on scriptural grounds that the trichotomous cosmology accords with the teachings of Christ. Still, it was necessary for philosophy to try to explain how and why science became atheistic in the first place; and this is just what Jean Borella has undertaken in his “Is Science Through with God?” Whether we follow Borella or Smith, we return to a Weltanschauung that can finally account for the world in all its dimensions, and, especially, find its meaning—a meaning weakened by several centuries of mechanical determinism.

Genres: Philosophy

180 pages, Paperback

Published January 1, 2018

About the author

Jean Borella is a Christian philosopher and theologian. Borella's works are deeply inspired by Ancient and Christian Neoplatonism, but also by the Traditionalist School of René Guénon and Frithjof Schuon.

Reviews

[Ernst Aristo Meister · Rating 5 out of 5]

Beautiful but at the same time unreachable. Wow

A book that you'll keep reading because it has no end. There's literally no end to what is described in this book.

[Luke]

Uncertain how to rate the book, though I enjoyed most of it. The first half under Wolfgang Smith was surprising and very interesting. I find the initial work in the second half by Borella to be very difficult to follow, and technical both in reference to philosophical ideas as well as definitions and language. The later sections by Borella were more approachable, but will take some consideration as to whether I can get on the same page.