Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

A Sanskrit Grammar: Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana

Rate this book
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

596 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1889

17 people are currently reading
138 people want to read

About the author

William Dwight Whitney

501 books8 followers
William Dwight Whitney was an American linguist, philologist, and lexicographer known for his work on Sanskrit grammar and Vedic philology as well as his influential view of language as a social institution. He was the first president of the American Philological Association and editor-in-chief of The Century Dictionary.

Whitney revised definitions for the 1864 edition of Webster's American Dictionary, and in 1869 became a founder and first president of the American Philological Association. In the same year he also became Yale's professor of comparative philology. Whitney also gave instruction in French and German in the college until 1867, and in the Sheffield scientific school until 1886. He wrote metrical translations of the Vedas, and numerous papers on the Vedas and linguistics, many of which were collected in the Oriental and Linguistic Studies series (1872–74). He wrote several books on language, and grammar textbooks of English, French, German, and Sanskrit.

His Sanskrit Grammar (1879) is notable in part for the criticism it contains of the Ashtadhyayi, the Sanskrit grammar attributed to Panini. Whitney describes the Ashtadhyayi as "containing the facts of the language cast into the highly artful and difficult form of about four thousand algebraic-like rules (in the statement and arrangement of which brevity alone is had in view at the cost of distinctness and unambiguousness)."

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
14 (35%)
4 stars
16 (40%)
3 stars
5 (12%)
2 stars
2 (5%)
1 star
3 (7%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for Panthea.
106 reviews37 followers
May 28, 2019
گرامر سانسکریت تا حد زیادی شبیه به گرامر اوستایی ـه؛ تفاوتهای تقریبن قابل توجهی توی واجها و تحولات آوایی از هندی-اروپایی بین این دوتا وجود داره اما حتی جکسون توی کتاب گرامر اوستایی ش بارها و بارها به همین کتاب و همین نویسنده ارجاع داده و از سانسکریت برای رمزگشایی و درک بهتر زبان اوستایی استفاده کرده؛ حتی توی مثالهایی که از افعال یا نام ها برای صرف و نحو میزنه حتمن سانسکریت ر لحاظ میکنه.
برای درک کامل دستور زبان اوستایی به نظرم لازمه که حتمن با دستور زبان سانسکریت هم لااقل آشنایی داشته باشید.
Profile Image for Nathan.
151 reviews11 followers
June 5, 2014
The phonological material is exhaustive but the syntactical material is a mess. No clear distinction between the Vedic and the Classical.

Not for the faint of heart.
28 reviews
June 25, 2017
Although I didn't have to know the complete Sanskrit grammar, this really helped me to fall back on when I need a more clear explanation of things. Extremely handy when learning the language.
1 review
August 8, 2017
It is actually good to gain knowledge in sanskrit and sanskrit grammar is the way to gain knowledge.
Profile Image for David.
Author 98 books1,188 followers
February 1, 2009
Extremely thorough, but not for the uninitiated. A serious background in languages and linguistics is needed, as well as a basic familiarity with Indo-European tongues.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.