Overall, I did enjoy this novel. While I understood it to be a mystery, I think billing it as such was an unfortunate choice. It read more as the portrait of a friendship, with the main conflict or adversity being the fallout from the death of one of the friends' husbands.
I think telling the story from alternating viewpoints was a successful choice. It allowed the three primary characters not only demonstrate their complexity, but also provided opportunity for extra insight into the relationship dynamics between the women (I think there a lot missed opportunities in the latter case). I think including the one male perspective was a distraction from the main plot and I would have preferred it be omitted. In fact, I found all the male characters were thinly constructed (which may well have been an intentional choice as the focus was - and needed to be - on the women).
However, I found that the story read more as a draft than a complete work. There were a lot of mistakes both in the language (including some really awkward wording), but also some messy bits in the story itself.
For starters, I felt that the pop culture references (SERIOUS props for working in a Remington Steele reference - it remains my absolute favourite show) were out of step with the purported ages and setting of the story. To provide some perspective: I am 41 years old, and, while I remember Remington Steele being on the air, my recollections are extremely vague (I rediscovered it in my 20s - I was about 10 when it concluded airing), and my great-uncles would have been of an age to serve in WW2 - but both my grandparents and parents were older when they had children. Had the novel been set in the early 2000s, I would have been much more convinced of the characters' familiarity with these references. I should clarify that I didn't catch any indication that the story was set in a time other than present day.
In the second place, I felt that the author should have done deeper (or any) research into the legal profession/legal system. (I am not in the legal profession nor have I done any research - I just like crime procedurals). There was at least one element - possibly two - in this novel that would have seen Alice up on disciplinary charges - or possibly even disbarred. In addition, another lawyer demonstrated some seriously questionable behaviour that, I suspect, is at least frowned upon in the field.
Based on this having been billed as a mystery, I found the element of mystery to be very weak. There wasn't any real tension for me in finding out the whodunnit element. Partly, this was the way Levi had been set out as character, and partly, it was the way the resolution unfolded. I think there was a lot of room to develop this element.
I think another editing pass to clean up some of the discrepancies and language problems, as well as perhaps some clarity about what this novel is really trying to be would make a big difference to this book.
Having said that, the characters (female) were interesting, compelling, and left me want to know more of their stories. I would be open to reading more from this author.
I received a copy of this novel through Voracious Readers Only.