Seeks to combine feminist voices with Deleuze and Guattari’s work Feminism and Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy share a commitment to reinvention and infinite variation, to follow the paths of individual vicissitudes and the sufferings and joys of the worlds in which we live, and to courageously imagine better futures. This volume seeks to open spaces for the intermingling of feminist voices with Deleuze and Guattari’s work, endorsing the transformational potential of such encounters. Key Features
It's good that people are writing with Deleuze and Guattari as the theory because I get to see a difference in how various people interpret that and it makes me feel better about my own. What will be hard is explaining my own.
I liked some articles better than others. One appeared written to overcomplicate and be hard to understand and I wondered why people do that- is it insecurity or do they just need to get better at writing? Writing above all should communicate. I think my favourite one was the one about Kiki being a witch but I liked a few of them ad found that useful.
The poetry was not my cup of tea, especially the one that did nothing but glorify p in V heterosexuality as some sort of ideal. Yawn. It's been done already and I don't get how it's "feminist" to still be bringing that tired old trope out.
Anyway the ones I liked and the ones that bored me...it's good people are writing them and thinking