This readable and conceptual approach to public policy carefully balances theory and practice to provide students at all levels with a solid grounding in policy analysis. Authors Randy S. Clemons and Mark K. McBeth explore the impact of mixed methodologies on policy analysis, supported by interesting and useful teaching cases. Offering a balanced view of public policy, the text addresses the political basis of policy making and analysis and covers the limitations, practical problems, and ethical implications of different techniques and methodologies. Models and tools are provided to help students develop the analytical skills necessary for policy analysis, while engaging boxes and anecdotes relate concepts to specific examples. In addition to new coverage, this edition has been revised to make the book even more accessible to undergraduates without weakening its usefulness to graduate students.
I have used a previous version of this book and this version for graduate level courses. This time around I have come the realization that it is a terrific book, but it is extremely difficult to use when teaching an asynchronous online course. I might look at other options in the future and use this as a recommended book in my courses.
I very much like the importance that the authors place on postpositivist perspectives. The book is also an easy read for the politically naive like me, and intermittently humorous. But my main objection is when the authors assume that public policy in the US "could easily be translated to a controversy about endangered elephants in Africa" (p. 7). The authors ignore the vast differences in political systems and everything else, seemingly not realising that the world is so different elsewhere. There are also quite a number of typo errors.
Good, though because of the structure of the course, I wasn't able to spend quite as much time on the concepts as I wish I could have. I appreciate how confident they are in the importance of a mixed methods approach for policy analysis and research.
This book was assigned for my Ed.D policy class. I will openly admit that I only read the first chapter, felt insulted, bookmarked the chapters in the book, and did not read another page. It was boring, and I felt that it wasn't applicable enough to my studies.