Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Handbook of Computational Quantum Chemistry

Rate this book
Quantum chemistry forms the basis of molecular modelling , a tool widely used to obtain important chemical information and visual images of molecular systems. Recent advances in computing have resulted in considerable developments in molecular modeling and these developments have led to
significant achievements in the design and synthesis of drugs and catalysts. This up-to-date and comprehensive text provides an accessible introduction to the implementation of quantum ideas in molecular modeling, exploring practical applications alongside theoretical explanations. Written in a
straightforward and accessible manner, Computational Quantum Chemistry provides a current account of a subject that has expanded enormously over the past decade.

768 pages, Hardcover

First published April 23, 1998

26 people want to read

About the author

David B. Cook

23 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (33%)
4 stars
4 (33%)
3 stars
3 (25%)
2 stars
1 (8%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Joseph Thacker.
12 reviews1 follower
February 8, 2017
A good book for anyone interested in implementing some quantum chemical theory. Despite being the most pragmatically useful book I have found on this subject (Szabo and Ostlund's book being the clearest, I believe, mathematically/theoretically), it is not without it's flaws. A major one being the use of rat77/ratfor, a language that is relatively unheard of even in the Fortran community. Whilst I understand that this book is somewhat dated, I still cannot understand ratfor's advantages over modular Fortran90 (or later) or C++ in terms of 'book keeping'.
Profile Image for MkB.
202 reviews9 followers
October 27, 2008
This is a pretty up-to-date and reasonably readable guide to computational chemistry. Most books are 25 years behind and/or incomprehensible to anybody who isn't a physical chemist.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.