One of the many things that has frustrated me as a teacher over the years, not only in sport-related programmes, is the question, appearing to be rhetorical but functionally reactionary, about why we need to deal with feminist approaches , when women ‘now have equality’. One of the things that continues to please me is when other students pop the bubble of the asker with evidence – in those sport-related programmes of the ways that sport, despite the changes of the last few decades, remains a male preserve. My students cite media coverage, participation rates, sexual harassment and abuse, prize money and more. Jaime Schultz’s excellent introductory text, despite its US focus, is a powerful reminder, with a global consciousness, of how far we’ve come and crucially how much longer the road is. (In the spirit of commentator integrity, I add here that Jaime is a good friend and valued co-researcher in issues around sport & social justice: I don’t think that would stop me being critical where necessary – it doesn’t usually.)
Well-pitched as a way into the key issues surrounding women’s sport, the text follows the OUP ‘what everyone needs to know’ Question and Answer format to provide a judicious balance of depth and breadth providing social and historical context to lay out key and foundational issues as well as highlight contemporary dynamics. Exploring issues of sex, gender and sexuality as well as the arguments for or against sex-segregated sport Schultz unpacks questions of the experience of participation, dealing with issues including femininities, sexualisation, homophobia, sex testing, transgender athletes and the question of muscularity. This come in the context of a rich discussion of women’s sports history and (in the only US-specific with limited transferability chapter) questions of federal funding, education (the fraught and problematic story of Title IX of the 1973 Education Act) and with it the question of gender equity in sport.
She then shifts focus to a discussion that is built around the institutions of sport to explore the Olympic and Paralympic games, here opening out the question of sport for and by women with impairments (the language in this area is always tricky – Schultz opts for impairments in line with the advice of the International Paralympic Committee). Here, as elsewhere, she is very good at maintaining a focus on the differences within the category ‘women’ to nuance discussions to include ‘race’, ethnicity, class, faith and a host of other markers of social difference and distinctiveness. There is a great discussion of women’s sport and media coverage along with the questions of work in the sport industries for women, including media work. Again, although there is a US-focus here, which she justifies to keep the text manageable but notes as ‘regrettably partial’ (p6), many of the points, and certainly the themes and tropes, as transferable even if some of the data is not. She then draws all of this discussion together into a penultimate chapter exploring questions of health and sport, with a good discussion of amongst other things injury rates and eating disorders before wrapping up the health discussion with a powerful discussion of sexual violence, concentrating on the recent US Gymnastics Association case and the prosecution of its medical advisor Larry Nassar.
Throughout much of the discussion there is a two-fold critique and caution: first, sports institutions often act to defend themselves and protect their interests, and second, in many cases (such as in the discussion of injuries) we have so little data (being a ‘male preserve’ means much of the research has focussed on men in sport, often with the assumption it applies also to women) that care is necessary and many judgements are provisional. She then concludes with a pointed discussion of where to, exploring notions of sport as a human right, looking at sport for peace and development programmes and charting the contemporary political climate. This is not a bird’s-eye view with an ‘impartial’ assessment; this is a carefully balanced approach that argues that while progress has been made there is further to go then we’ve come (not that she puts it that bluntly, but the evidence presented makes that clear – to me at least!).
This is an outstanding introductory, state-of-the-play text that manages to be both outward looking and specific, contemporary and historically grounded. The one thing that would have improved the book is a ‘further reading’ section – but it looks like that is a publisher decision: I’ve not seen those in others in the OUP series, which is a pity. This, then, is great for introductory classes (and I suspect secondary as well as tertiary education) and good for general as well as educational readers. All in all, it is a cracker of a text, and highly recommended.