Authors Scott Fowler and Charles Chandler were beat reporters for the Carolina Panthers football team, so you knew what type of book they were going to write. Which was a book that squeezed just about every detail it could out of the 1996 Carolina Panthers.
Year of the Cat was a comprehensive analysis of the 1996 Panthers, and it's one of the better analysis of a pro or college football team I've ever read. The game summaries were engrossing, the on and off the field analysis of the teams' key players were well written, and etc.
Pros of Year of The Cat: The book analyzed its subject to a tee, which means you can't come away from this book and not be educated on the 1996 Carolina Panthers.
Cons of Year of The Cat: What cons?
In conclusion, Year of the Cat explained in almost 300 pages what went right and wrong with the 1996 Carolina Panthers. This book wasn't interested in painting a pretty picture of that team, it was more interested in giving you the details on how much of a grind an NFL season is even if you have a good or great team.