Five stars for the collection, three stars for the commentary, that's how it got a four-star rating.
This collection has mainly two parts, one is the poems, the other is the essays. While the poems revealed a lot about the poet's more personal thinking and private life, and more appealing and enduring, the essays showed the serious arguments when it comes to persuading those in power to fight vigorously and get back what had been lost to the invaders. That's the merit of the poet which I had only heard about before.
On the other hand it makes me wonder about the traditional ideal handed down from Confucius. Would it be better, both for the poet and for the people at the time, to have an alternative choice instead of putting all hopes on the ruler and remaining loyal to him no matter what?