Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Return of George Sutherland

Rate this book
In this book, Hadley Arkes seeks to restore, for a new generation, the jurisprudence of the late Justice of the Supreme Court George Sutherland--a jurisprudence anchored in the understanding of natural rights. The doctrine of natural rights has become controversial in our own time, while Sutherland has been widely maligned and screened from our historical memory. He is remembered today as one of the "four horsemen" who resisted Roosevelt and the New Deal; but we have forgotten his leadership in the cause of voting rights for women. Both liberal and conservative jurists now deride Sutherland, yet both groups continue to draw upon his writings. Liberals look to Sutherland for a jurisprudence that protects "privacy" against the rule of majorities, as in matters concerning abortion or gay rights. Conservatives will appeal to his defense of freedom in the economy.


However, both liberals and conservatives deny the premises of natural rights that provided the ground, and coherence, of Sutherland's teaching. Arkes contends that Sutherland can supply what is missing in both conservative and liberal jurisprudence. He argues that if a new generation can look again, with unclouded eyes, at the writings of Sutherland, both liberals and conservatives can be led back to the moral ground of their jurisprudence. This compelling intellectual biography introduces readers to an urbane man, and a steely judge, who has been made a stranger to them.

312 pages, Hardcover

First published August 8, 1994

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Hadley Arkes

26 books18 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (25%)
4 stars
4 (50%)
3 stars
1 (12%)
2 stars
1 (12%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Chad.
79 reviews2 followers
March 24, 2014
Despite its title, this book was only marginally connected to the biography or writings of George Sutherland. The whole book is focused on a particular way of judicial reasoning (one which I do not disagree with), however the author focused so much on the theory and so little on Sutherland that I was rather disappointed. Also, being a highly theoretical book it was more difficult to engage. Not worth your time if your goal is learning more about Sutherland.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review