Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Principles of Argumentation

Rate this book
Excerpt from The Principles of Argumentation

The principles set forth in this book, the queries answered, I have so often talked over with the assistants who, at Harvard and Wellesley, have aided me in my work, that I feel the results here given are as much theirs as mine. I owe so much in the past, also, to their enthu siasm and their intelligent devotion to their work, that I cannot refrain from recognizing my indebtedness. For valuable suggestions while this book has been going through the press and for reading of the proofs I wish in particular to thank assistant-professor S. C. Hart of Wellesley College, and Mr. F. G. Caffey, of Montgomery, Alabama. For the classification of definitions used on pp. 54 - 59 I am indebted to Professor Genung in his Practical Elm/tents of R/zetorz'c.

About the Publisher

Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com

This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

426 pages, Hardcover

First published November 1, 2007

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

George Pierce Baker

89 books2 followers
1866-1935

His most valuable work, Dramatic Technique is now available free at Project Gutenberg: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36580

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (20%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
4 (80%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
163 reviews2 followers
October 3, 2016
The copy I got from my library is so old that there is an agreement signed in 1903. I feel this is how the style of the book relates to me, its not unreadable but trying to reach a very different audience. I read from another book about logic amd while this was more specific, it did show the basics behind buildong a compelling argument. It's just a shame that I really don't remember anything besides some of the stories and the basic structure of a brief. Oh well, maybe for another time.
Displaying 1 of 1 review