"Philip Selznick has profoundly affected how all serious students of organizations think about their subject. Leadership in Administration is, perhaps, his a lucid, rigorous, yet humane analysis of the essential task of leadership that brilliantly reaffirms the organic, value-infused character of a successful enterprise, whether private or public. The central concepts of the book--'mission,' 'distinctive competence'--have become so much a part of our vocabulary that we sometimes forget they had to be invented and that Selznick invented them. His reminder that the true exercise of leadership transcends a concern with mere efficiency is even more appropriate in today's era of quasi-scientific thought about organizations than it was when, presciently, he first set it forth in 1957."--James Q. Wilson, Harvard University
"The reappearance of Leadership in Administration will be most welcome to students of organizations because it provides the most lucid and complete statement available of Selznick's special view of organizations. This view has given rise to the institutionalist school of organizational analysis, one of the liveliest and more irrelevant alternatives to mainstream rationalist formulations."--W. Richard Scott, Stanford University
"Leadership in Administration has become a classic in the art of executive leadership. In fact, it is stimulating more managerial thought and organizational research today than ever before."--Robert H. Miles, Harvard Business School
I first read Selznick’s little volume Leadership in Administration in the early eighties while I was a Ph.D. student, and it started me on a lifelong career seeking to understand the roles and applications and essence of leadership. Selznick’s ideas were groundbreaking, and underlie many of the most commonly understood elements of organizational scholarship we have today. Strategic theorists such as Miles and Snow, Michael Porter, and other prominent names built on the foundation laid by Selznick. Leadership scholars and writers such as John Kotter, Ed Schein, and many others likewise built on Selznick’s foundation. In fact, in ways too numerous to count, much of the field of organizational behavior would likely not be where it is today without Selznick’s work. A few of his most important ideas, as expressed in Leadership in Administration follow:
• He argued persuasively for an organic over a mechanistic view of organizations, not dismissing the latter, but ensconcing the former in its place of leadership in organizations. • He argued that values, and hence leadership, belong at the core of the organization and are a fundamental strength in its survival and success. • He focused on large organizations, but his ideas and counsel seem to me to apply to all types of organizations, both large and small, for profit or non-profit. Ram Charan makes this point also in his book What Your CEO Wants You To Know, arguing that, scaled up or down, principles of leadership and effective organizations apply to the smallest one person shop and the largest multinational organizations. • Selznick addresses leadership styles of the fox (innovative) and the lion (maintainance), and thus was an early forerunner of those who have created useful typologies of organizational strategies. • He asserted that leadership generally moves from the executive to the statesman in style – moving from administrative management (mechanistic) to institutional leadership (organic) – and that this is the path of growth of a leader. He did not set aside the importance of execution, but added to it the critical importance of setting and establishing core guiding values and the creation of institutional identity • Pointed out that managers (administration) are needed most where decisions and decision-making require little creativity and simply carry out the already established policies and procedures of the organization. Leaders are needed to create and establish those key values and the structure that supports and sustains them (including organizational mission, resolution of conflicts, institutional purpose, and so forth), and to transform a group of individuals into a committed and focused team. • Leaders, then, ask (and answer) critical questions such as “What shall we do?” and “What shall we be?” and the answers lead to an understanding of the organization’s mission. Further leadership establishes and sets in place systems and structures to maintain the value-based culture of the organization. • Thus, leadership is most needed when the organization’s goals are not well defined, when external direction is not easily imposed, or when goals and values are more easily swayed. It is then that the institutional integrity of the organization becomes most important, and results from the strength – the endurability – of the organization's values and culture.
This is a very heavy book. It offers some real food for thought and interesting ideas on how to view leadership in larger organizations. However, I probably need to reread it. There's so much to take in and process.
I read this book in my college library many many yars after it was written. I was impressed because it was so updated like it was written nowadays. A few days ago i met this book again. It was on the shelves of a second hand bookstore in Dublin close to the Trinnity College. For me it was like meeting a good friend from the past. Now the book is in my library and you know what, it is the 1957 edition by Row, Peterson & Co. forworded by Clarence B. Randall