This is a hard book for me to review because there was so much I liked, but also so much I found incomprehensible. I like the author’s writing style: simple, direct descriptive language that creates vivid scenes. I also was fascinated by the rich culture she created: the Wanderers, the Travelers, the Renegades, and other castes in the sort-of medieval setting. But some of the stories were almost surreal, and I don’t think that was the intention of the writer.
My favorite story is “The Renegade King”. It is short, has tight plot, and has the feel of a traditional fairy tale told with a modern dry humor. I enjoyed “Wanderer”, too. Again, it is a relatively short story with a plot I could follow. I loved the sea and storm imagery and the poetic aspects of the prose.
I also liked most of “Nyarai: Traveler of the Circle.” However, the plot kind of rambled and one critical scene—a rescue—was skipped over, for some reason. Which leads me to the problem I had with this book: I often felt like important scenes or important parts of scenes were left out. For example, in the first story the heroine has been captured and is on the brink of rescue, when suddenly the story jumps to after the rescue. I could handle that jump, though I was disappointed (I wanted to read about how the rescue happened), but every few pages the story jumped again and again until I no longer understood the plot and lost interest in the story. Most of the narratives in the book have that flaw: sudden skips, almost like pages or sentences had been dropped from the text.
I regret saying this, because I found individual scenes and characters very interesting and compelling, and I really liked the strange cultural elements and social mores of the imaginary society. I hate to give negative feedback, especially when I kept getting glimpses of a unique vision and writing style. I felt like I was reading a book that teetered between “really good” and “needs to be revised”.