We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon

by Fred Steckling

Documented with 125 NASA photographs and area blowups.

191 pages, Paperback

First published July 1, 1981

Reviews

[Norm · Rating 5 out of 5]

This phenomenal book in its tenth edition as of 2014 is available directly from the author’s son, Glenn Steckling, on the ‘bay. Earlier versions available online suffer from poor German-to-English translations but this latest edition is void of all grammatical errors.

We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon II’s most impressive feat is its vast collection of photographs (eight in full color), with analysis, of unexplainable objects on and about the moon. This is a must-read for anyone interested in the possibility of other life in the universe.

[Mike Lisanke · Rating 2 out of 5]

Not a great or compelling story. The author bought into the picture worth a thousand word thinking and add what always are and always have been nebulous photos of what are supposed to be alien UFO and moon craters with life and atmosphere, etc. etc. I would have loved to hear a more convincing story with speculations of government coverup. But it was just said and expected to be convincing. This book did nothing for me But was mentioned in other books which had a great tale of plausible intrigue. Perhaps you will find more from the photos which I mostly ignored.

[Christopher Heckman · Rating 3 out of 5]

I have the 8th Edition, when there were still some mis-translations.

This is evidently a classic in the "someone's on the moon" genre. The author(s) provide pictures and an explanation to support this thesis.

Kind of a disappointment, actually. Most of the pictures are in black and white, and of questionable quality. I can see what the authors are referring to in some cases, but not in others.

[Dan Zarfati · Rating 4 out of 5]

The book is a classic, not as much as Leonard's "There is somebody else on the Moon", but very important indeed, there are quite a few flaws on this book but also many interesting ideas, a few of the plates may be anomalous indeed, but many may be defects from low definition photos.