Fine. Revelation Verse by Verse provides much needed clarity on the broad-stroke ideas of Revelation, while unfortunately leaving some to be desired in terms of specific fulfillments of prophecies. The clarity mainly comes through the highlighting of theological takeaways at nearly every opportunity, which makes the book approachable to the average Christian, particularly for devotional activities. In fact, nearly every chapter ends with a devotional thought. One that especially stands out to me is the end of the commentary on chapter 7 about the multitude of Christians gathered in Heaven where Osbourne comments that “no matter how bad it may get for the followers of Christ, it will all be worthwhile." Christians can endure all sorts of abuse and persecution with joy, knowing that every harsh word shouted, every hand raised, every hurt caused against them simply hearkens us one step closer to the triumph already secured in Christ for a countless number from every tribe and tongue.
One other theme that particularly stands out is Osbourne’s focus on the character of Christ. The author points out throughout the commentary how high and glorious the Christology of Revelation is. For instance, I honestly had not noticed how many references there are to the deity of Christ, but Osbourne shines a light on this area by commenting that the “worship of chapter 4-5 in particular highlights the unity of Father and Son. The two hymns in chapter 4 worship God, the first two in chapter 5 worship the Lamb, and the fifth hymn in 5:13 is sung to the two on the throne together” (Osbourne 2016, 103-104). He also points out that the title “King of kings and Lord of lords” in reference to Jesus “means that he is Lord of the universe” and therefore is God. While this may appear obvious, I had not previously made the connection that being “Lord of lords” clearly entails deity, and it is these kinds of insights that give the commentary value.
Sadly, Osbourne has a habit of making claims with little in the way of justification or explanation. This habit appears in his commentary on Revelation 20:5, which states that “the rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.” He rightly takes this to be referring to unbelievers, but then inexplicably takes this to “mean that when unbelievers die, their next conscious moment will be when they face God at the last judgment, unlike Christians, who go immediately to heaven." This does not follow from the text at all. For one thing, if he is taking the phrase “come to life” to mean “come into consciousness from a state of unconsciousness,” then according to verse 4 his logic would demand that, after dying, the next conscious moment for believers would be the beginning of the millennial reign of Christ, which he flatly denies. For another thing, he provides no justification whatsoever of why we should take the phrase “come to life” to mean this, rather than talking about a physical resurrection. He simply asserts this modified version of the doctrine of soul sleep for unbelievers and moves on, with no explanation.
One other minor criticism is that Osborne does not include the actual text of the verses of Revelation that he is commenting on, which is slightly inconvenient. With these criticisms in mind, I would still say that the book was overall helpful in increasing my understanding of the prominent themes Revelation, but it was not the clearest commentary that I have read on the book.