As we delve into the story of Hugh O'Neill and Mabel Bagenal in Brian Friel's play "Making History," we are confronted with the challenge of unravelling the truth behind the historical portrayal. Lombard's account paints a male-centric and nationalist view of history, leading to the question of who Mabel is and why her image is depicted in a way that does not align with her true character.
It is tempting to attribute Mabel's absence from history to her gender and unsuitability in a male-dominated political arena or her Anglo background. However, Friel's play aims to uncover the truth behind the omission. Instead of questioning the author's ability to uncover buried history, we must examine the message he conveys through this "historical" play.
Friel is explicit in his self-identification as a history-maker rather than a historian. Clues throughout the play, such as Mabel's death being inaccurately portrayed, suggest that what we see may not be genuine history, similar to Lombard's biased accounts. Therefore, we must ask, what is Friel attempting to express through this play?Precisely, what does Mabel symbolise?
Of course Mabel is the woman O’Neill loved, but what was behind his love? Through Mabel's characterisation as an intelligent and educated English-style Irish aristocrat, Friel suggests that she represents a more advanced civilisation. Her ambition to civilise Ireland with English culture, as seen in her conversation with Mary about spreading seeds from England, further reinforces this notion. Additionally, her comparison to Queen Elizabeth I through O'Neill's line in Act 1, scene 1, regarding the watch, symbolises her equality with the queen. In short, Mabel illustrates the potential for progress and modernisation, which is O’Neill really loves to see, and which is also Irish people fail to see.
Returning to the main character, Hugh O'Neill. If the previously deduction is valid, we can interpret his "sorry letter" to Queen Elizabeth I as a confession to Mabel. Through this, we can see that O'Neill's betrayal of the queen, Mabel, and progressive culture is due to his Irish allies' seduction in politics, symbolised by the mistresses in his personal life. Despite his awareness of the danger of embracing Irish patriotism over English civilisation, his emotions and loyalty to his people leave him with no other option. Ultimately, his attempt to portray himself as the only one who can unite Irish clans fails. His failure not only signified the failure of Irish people to embrace an advanced culture, or even a more moderate version of it - through the hybridity of Irish-born English-educated political elite Hugh O’Neill - but also the victory of over-simplified patriotic historiography represented by the work of Lombard which led to the opposite version of historical nihilism.
Broadly speaking, the tension between progressive and patriotic love is a recurring theme in Irish literature, as seen in the story of Dervorgilla, who believed that the English would bring a "good end" to Ireland. Through O'Neill's betrayal and regret for Mabel, Friel warns us of the danger of blind patriotic passion. Friel's desired outcome for Irish history is for Ireland to coexist and be civilised by modern civilisation, such as England. Only through this coexistence can the history of Ireland truly begin.