I’m not sure where I heard about this book. I thought it was a book about “general” leadership, which is a topic of interest to me. In fact, they really do mean “crisis” leadership; think 9/11, oil spills, hurricane devastation, financial meltdown, or Three Mile Island, and perhaps even pandemic... I pushed myself through ¾ of the book. I believe that it does have some useful information for leaders during such crises. Things like being explicitly clear about meeting dates/times and punctuality (seems these should be givens, but apparently not). There was discussion of dealing with the media, which seemed quite reasonable advice, even important for those in such positions. I kept thinking about many organization leaders during this past year, who I’d say were crisis leaders: politicians, universities, health care settings (especially!), and so forth.
Of note was that 80% of conflict in teams were due to unclear goals. Of the remaining 20%, 80% of those were due to unclear roles and responsibilities. Only 1% was due to interpersonal conflict. And from a crisis management perspective, those who were leaders in financial positions during the 2008 financial crisis who had studied the depression and knew a lot about how that worked, or didn't work, impacted greatly their approach in 2008, which overall mitigated the effect of that particular crisis. i.e., history can teach.
What this book did not have, was an editor who knew what they were doing. There were misspelled words, words missing grammatically, periods misplaced, etc. I started writing some down, thinking there were just a few and I might try to send the information to the publisher, but realized there was an error about every 2 pages; it was pathetic. I’ve never read any kind of book, fiction or non-fiction, which had errors of this magnitude. I stopped reading because the errors drove me nuts, and I decided that putting up with them wasn’t worth it since the topic wasn’t really what I had thought. Additionally, the writing style was a bit odd, using bullet lists with odd lead-ins. Generally, not pleasant to read.
IF you are in a position of crisis leadership, you might find it useful to peruse. If not, ignore.