The survivors and victims inhabiting the pages of Capital Tales dash forever the romantic myth that our peerless captains of industry are guiding us through the mists of progress to a shining land of prosperity. Tough, uncompromising portraits of people discovering the illusions they live by, the stories culminate in a confrontation between the narrator and a nineteenth-century British philosopher—a meeting of minds which leaves no meaning of the word “capital” unexamined.
Brian Fawcett is best known for his book "Cambodia: A Book for People Who Find Television Too Slow". Capital Tales was written a few years earlier.
I like Brian Fawcett; he's funny and the views he conveys about society in his stories are biting but never cynical.
I would say that there are two types of stories in this collection: 1) stories where crazy things happen to stupid or hapless people; and 2) stories that aren't about anything else but the act of writing. Is that what they call meta-literature or postmodernism? Whatever. I preferred the first type.