I often find James' writing style quite frustrating, but that frustration is usually offset by the quality of the content. However, this was not the case for Notes on Dialectics. The quality of the content really felt lacking in this text. I don't understand why James felt the need to use Hegel, and then Hegel through Lenin, to make a critique of his contemporary Trotskyist movement that, all in all, doesn't even particularly add up. The whole thing seems tediously and unnecessarily methodological, whilst also lacking in materialist analysis. Some of the critiques made seems to be basically - used in the hope that if you say it enough times maybe they will eventually become true. Perhaps the benefit of historical hindsight allows one to make these critiques of the political conclusions of this text, but nonetheless, I feel they stick.
If it wasn't for a few jovialities in the text and a few glimmers of good substance, in all honestly, this would have certainly been a 2 star review.