Theology, the study of God, is often subdivided into Christology, Soteriology, Pneumatology, Ecclesiology, and Eschatology, as well as Anthropology. In order, that would be the study of God as Incarnate, God Who Saves, God Miraculously Involved, God’s Church, and the study of Last Things, as well as the study of the Human Relationship to God and Others. Being Human in God’s World: An Old Testament Theology of Humanity falls, obviously, into the last category. Researched by J. Gordon McConville, Old Testament Theology Professor at the University of Gloucestershire, Being Human in God’s World: An Old Testament Theology of Humanity builds on the proposition that the Bible invites a “performative” response (pp. 5, 7). Assuming the divine-human relationship is supposed to be transformative (p. 5), McConville defines transcendence as potential for personal change which understanding the resources for that change are external (p. 6).
As one usually discovers, almost all biblical approaches to anthropology begin with Imago dei (“image of God”) and this study is no exception, but McConville considers the concept to be a stimulus for reflection, not simply a staid doctrinal stance (p. 12). Most importantly, McConville suggests humanity as an artisan representation of God (p. 22). “Godlikeness is a commission to accept [God’s vision and intention], with an element of exploration.” (p. 27) Since, the early chapters of Genesis form the foundation for this position, I really enjoyed an observation he made about the transition from Genesis 2 to Genesis 3. There is a “pun” in those verses between Genesis 2:25 where the word for “naked” sounds like the word used for “cunning” used in 3:1 to describe the serpent (“uh-roo-meem” vs. “ah-room”) and McConville writes that it is: “…wide-eyed wonder juxtaposed with one of subtle calculation.” (p. 33).
One cannot “do” theology without considering terminology. Although McConville sees more options in translating the Hebrew for “heart” than the dominant understanding of the organ as a metaphor for “will” or “intention.” Still, he posits, “The metaphor of ‘circumcision of the heart’ expresses the point vividly. The mark of the covenant in the flesh has no force apart from the thoroughgoing engagement of the person.” (p. 56) “The rhetoric operates on this level, also, showing an acute awareness of the human propensity to lapse from best intentions.” (p. 56) In considering the terminology of body organs with relationship to “personhood,” he states: “…persons are understood in their wholeness, ‘being aware of their various motives and being able to bring them all together.’” (p. 67)
The volume is full of insightful observations about the use of language in the Bible. I particularly liked the quotation where he cited, “Metaphor is the poet’s indispensable way of expressing what is on the edge of inexpressibility.” (p. 75) He further identifies typology as the quality “…that enables the human experience that is relayed by the Old Testament to be mediated through the story and life of a particular people, which we may provisionally call ancient Israel.” (pp. 81-82) He also sees the erotic language in Hosea and even Jeremiah as a metaphor for the love of God. (p. 94) From there, he could argue, “The idea of human love as symbolic of the divine in the Song [of Songs] is found not only in traditional Christian allegorical readings of it but also in recent scholarship.” (p. 94, n. 27) As noted earlier in the book, there is an assertion that “Desire” (even for God) is more fundamental to human existence than sex—turning Freud rather upside-down (p. 79). More specifically, “…he [Hosea] both deploys the metaphor of Yahweh as husband and also categorically denies that Yahweh is ‘a man’ (Hosea 11:9b). In this way Hosea preserves the uniqueness and otherness of God yet displays the necessity of anthropomorphism in language about him.” (p. 165)
The concept of humanity needing physical space and “place” expressing one’s life’s context (p. 100) had an interesting consideration. So many people think of the human relation to God as being limiting, but McConville uses spatial metaphors to express the idea that the “…wide horizon of creativity does not diminish the local and particular but intensifies it.” (p. 101) And humanity, as an artisan, is presented as relating to God and the creation: “Human creativity is an exercise of sympathetic intelligence, exploring and revealing the good things already latent in the order of nature.” (p. 173) And, considering creativity versus the Old Testament’s proscription of “graven images,” he quotes a very perceptive sculptor (Barbara Hepworth) who “’decided that it was sin only when the image south to elevate the pretensions of man instead of man praising God and his universe.’” (p. 185)
Perhaps the most insightful summary in the volume is that humanity lives is a constant tension between joy and flourishing (which McConnville also sees as “salvation”) versus tragedy and despair, “…enshrined formally…in the covenantal trope of the blessing and the curse (Deut. 28); in the psalmic dialectic between lamentation and praise; in the overarching narrative of Israel as a perpetual balance between possession and loss, and in the prophetic model of history as conflict between the lust for power and the realization of the rule of God.” (p. 190)
McConnville admits that tension is never resolved in the Old Testament; it takes the New Testament perspective to accomplish that. Being Human in God’s World: An Old Testament Theology of Humanity is relatively easy reading, considering the complex issues it covers and the depth of scholarship underlying each discussion. There is nothing stale in this study and it points to plenty of rich possibilities for further studies.