Joachim Schulte's introduction provides a distinctive and masterful account of the full range of Wittgenstein's thought. It is concise but not compressed, substantive but not overloaded with developmental or technical detail, informed by the latest scholarship but not pedantic.
Immensely confusing, but I just about expected that, having no real prior knowledge about Wittgenstein. The parts that I did understand though, I thought were fascinating, and I definitely felt encouraged by the book to learn more about it.
I. Introduction of life, personality, work. Klosterneuburg and Norway and the Bros Karamazov and how he 'lectured' and the Russian teacher's claim that she could detect his former students years later from certain mannerisms.
II: Tractatus. Doesn't get too deep into logical specifics, rather focuses on the characterization of the nature of the world and logical constants. They show themselves, but are not expressible through language as they don't represent anything. No things. Boundaries. (7)
III. Links. Talks about ethics, mythology. Grammar concept develops, the insecurity of math is exposed. Demand for overviewableness, links, Schulte smiling!
IV Language games. Just as he was introduced in Language 101, except went deeper into public flexibility of rules and paradigms.
V Criteria. Just as he was introduced in Self-Consciousness and Body-Consciousness. (toothaches) Long bit on impossibility of private languages, followed by a less clear discussion on aspects (ghost!!!) which I like but don't all swallow.
VI Certainty. This is the stuff that rocks my boat.
A fairly good introduction to the basic themes present in Wittgenstein's philosophy. As is expected of an introductory text, the analysis present offers just enough to peek the interest of unfamiliar readers without becoming altogether too cumbersome. One minor downfall (although, I really must stress the minor aspect) is that the presentation, at times, offers overviews which are, to be fair, somewhat contentious, without properly alluding to their uncertain position among scholars of Wittgenstein. Again, this is a minor critique in that the book is, after all, primarily serving as an introduction to Wittgenstein, and not an exegetical text.