Interesting journalistic play-by-play of some important cases in medical ethics through history. However, Pence's commentary on these cases leaves much to be desired. Pence varies the structure of his chapters significantly, formatting some as a dialectic between opposing sides while writing others as a survey of different stances. While some variety is necessary, the differences made some chapters engaging while others a drag. Furthermore, Pence shows some personal bias in the viewpoints and research he references. An easy example is the serious overrepresentation of UAB in the book. He also frequently strawmans standpoints, framing them as unreasonably extreme when this is often not the case. Altogether, the book is a good introduction and should open the doors for more detailed reading on topics of interest to the reader.