I am not a military scholar, and I am not from Australia or New Zealand, and I am only marginally aware of the Anzac losses at Gallipoli. But I do appreciate history, and the hard work of research. So, when I was given the opportunity to read and learn from this book, I took it.
There is so much that I did not know about the precursors to the assassination which signaled the official start of WWI, but a few of them are: the first recorded car bomb was in 1905 targeting the Ottoman sultan, the mail post was as important as the spy networks, there was a not-so-civil war in Syria in 1909, the blockade of the Dardanelles by Italy in 1911 demonstrated the need to control Gallipoli.
Throughout the book there are replicas (hardcover), or clickable specific articles and period maps from a wide assortment of newspapers in AU and GB, and a plethora of them in the US retrievable from the Library of Congress. Control of information by the military is hardly new or localized, but there are enough discrepancies noted to definitely call things into question.
Some things that I learned about this theater of the war are: the capabilities of the Queen Elizabeth class of dreadnought and it's far range shells were kept deliberately covert, Marconi was an Italian soldier of the time and his wireless radios on ships and planes were usd to triangulate targets, defeat of the Ottomans was seen as a Christian victory, the allies attacked Gallipoli from the sea while the Russ came in to attack from over the mountains, while there is no denying the horrors of this doomed plan by Churchill it was actually a victory as the Anzacs won and handed it over to the Garibaldeans who then handed it over to the Macedonians, the Ottoman POWs were sent to Egypt.
Not only was there so much to learn, but the learning (and enjoyment) were enhanced by the integration of the maps and articles into the body of the work instead of being relegated to a massive appendix.
If we do not learn from history.....