Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Medical Ethics

When Doctors Say No: The Battleground of Medical Futility

Rate this book
"The book is a fine addition to the world of academic medical ethics . . . Readers . . . will come away with some of the tools for further debate." ―Publishers Weekly

"Susan B. Rubin's splendid new book . . . offers positive, humane solutions to the frustrations that have given rise to the futility debate." ―Carl Elliott, Medical Humanities Review

"Rubin offers a thorough and thought-provoking exploration of the concept of futility as a basis for medical decisions." ―Choice

". . . [the] brilliant analysis found in Rubin's [book] couldn't be more timely. . . . When Doctors Say No is the most thorough philosophical rebuttal to be found in the literature of medical futility as the basis for unilateral decisionmaking by physicians." ―Charles Weijer, Canadian Medical Association Journal

Should physicians be permitted to unilaterally refuse to provide treatment that they deem futile? Even if the patient, or the patient's family, insists that everything possible must be done?

In this book, philosopher and bioethicist Rubin examines this controversial issue. She offers a critique of the concept of medical futility and the debate surrounding it, and she calls for more public debate about the underlying issues at stake for all of us―patients, families, health care providers, insurers, and society at large.

208 pages, Hardcover

First published October 1, 1998

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (25%)
4 stars
3 (75%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Rahul.
118 reviews
December 22, 2024
Long on theory but relatively short on example. Very clearly written; Rubin raises the important point that futility must be goal-driven, and problematizes the evaluative/physiological paradigm in ways that I think are important (unilateral physician decisionmaking is not the move), but her proposed solutions don't seem that great either (which I think she recognizes, as she critiques them herself). Her desire to bring the public into the fold seems optimistic, but I think her advocating for a genuine conversation between physicians and patients is very correct. Great read, if a bit dry.
Profile Image for Barry Mann.
405 reviews4 followers
July 23, 2014
brilliant and clear ethical discourse,a must have for any bio ethics committee
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews