Reconsidering Social Constructionism: Debates in Social Problems Theory

by Gale Miller (Editor)

With the impact of social interactionist and ethnographic methodology twenty-five years ago, the research agenda in social problems began to shift its focus, giving rise to the Social Constructionism movement. The present volume and the related shorter text, Constructionist Controversies, review the substantial contributions made by social constructionist theorists over that period, as well as recent debates about the future of the perspective. These contributions redefine the purpose and central questions of social problems theory and articulate a research program for analyzing social problems as social constructions. A generation of theorists has been trained in the constructionist perspective and has extended it through numerous analyses of diverse aspects of contemporary social life.The debates in this volume pose fundamental questions about the major assumptions of the perspective, the ways in which it is practiced, and the purposes of social problems theory. Their point of departure is Ibarra and Kitsuse's essay, cutting new theoretical ground in calling for ""investigating vernacular resources, especially rhetorical forms, in the social problems process.""Contributors are forceful proponents both within and outside of the social constructionist community, who take a broad array of positions on the current state of social problems theory and on the rhetorical forms that need exploring. They also lay down the general lines for diverse and often competing programs for the future development of the constructionist agenda.

572 pages, Hardcover

First published December 31, 1993

About the author

Gale Miller is a professor and research professor of social and cultural sciences, recognized for his contributions to the study of language, psychotherapy, and social coping mechanisms. His research explores how people use language to make sense of the world, with a focus on everyday interactions. In the late 1980s, he played a key role in defining Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, a revolutionary approach that emphasizes solutions rather than diagnosing problems. His later work examined how families of incarcerated individuals cope with their loved ones' imprisonment and support their reintegration into society. Miller’s research integrates sociological theory, social science methodology, and real-world applications, influencing both academic and therapeutic fields. He was the recipient of the 2012 Lawrence G. Haggerty Faculty Award for Research Excellence.

Reviews

[Titus Hjelm · Rating 3 out of 5]

Finally! I bought this book in 2000, when it was still relatively recent, used a couple of strategic quotes for my thesis, and then only picked I up a couple of years ago as part of a 'I'm going to finish all the unfinished books on my shelves' project. Some of it had stood the test of time and is still relevant. Unfortunately, the key essay, around which most of the others revolve, is very problematic in itself. But most importantly, the book reminded me how massively happy I am that postmodernism in the social sciences is dead. The PM chapters in the volume (published in 1993, probably the heyday of French theory in US social sciences) are just what you would expect: pretentious, self-important, and largely uninformative. The critical theory-social problems nexus remains mostly unexplored, and if an updated version was to be published, I'd like to see more of that. Anyway, not really a classic material, but an interesting snapshot of the early 1990s social problems theory.