What do you think?
Rate this book
Balletmaster
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
May 23, 2015
A few months ago, Miami City Ballet came to my home city, Vancouver, with an all-Balanchine evening. Good ballet troupes don’t often visit Vancouver, so of course, I went. It was a magical performance. It was also the first time I’ve seen Balanchine’s ballets alive on stage. I fell in love.
I’m not the only Balanchine’s fan. George Balanchine, the choreographer, was an era in the world ballet. He was one of the first to introduce abstract ballet to European and American public. His unique, cool and brilliant style enchanted or repulsed the ballet-loving audience all over the world, but nobody was left indifferent. His musicality was legendary. And his personality was huge, not easy to deal with. He was a genius.
After the performance, I came home and took this book off my shelf. I wanted to read it. It has a subtitle: A Dancer’s View of George Balanchine. The author was a ballerina herself, although most readers would probably recognize her name from the old movie The Red Shoes.
Shearer’s book is a biography of George Balanchine, one of the greatest choreographers of the 20th century, written from a dancer’s point of view. You won’t find a deep analysis here, but you’ll find most of Balanchine’s ballets, his collaborators, and the turbulent events of his life.
He was born in Russia in 1904. He matured with the 20th century. The Russian revolution found him a student of the St. Petersburg Ballet School. During the first years after the revolution, the young Mariinsy Theatre dancer performed and choreographed as much as he could. The trend continued after he left Russia.
He worked in Europe, and later in America, and always hungry for new jobs, he would stage dances for ballets and operas, music hall and drama, movie and circus. Once, he choreographed a show for a bunch of dancing elephants in tutus. Whatever the job was, he would take it.
He created a new ballet style, but his life, like any trailblazer's, wasn’t easy or simple. Shearer peppers her book with the names of dancers, artists, composers, and impresarios who came into Balanchine’s sphere, worked with him or for him, loved him or hated him. For the readers unconnected with the theatre world, such writing wouldn’t be very interesting. For me – it was fascinating, especially the first Russian period in Balanchine’s life.
I became a ballet fan when I was in university in Moscow. I never danced myself but I went to as many ballets as I could afford, and I read books about ballet. Every name Shearer mentions in her book was familiar to me, like a snippet of gossip about an old acquaintance. I inhaled those stories.
I know less about the European ballet history, so the later period of Balanchine’s life contained more names I didn’t know, and as a result was a bit drab.
On the whole, if you don’t like ballet or are not interested in it, don’t read this book. It would bore you to tears. If you do like ballet, it would be an engaging read, teeming with names of most famous theatrical people of the 20th century, with tons of little facts and quirky speculations. An absolute must for every ballet fan.
I’m not the only Balanchine’s fan. George Balanchine, the choreographer, was an era in the world ballet. He was one of the first to introduce abstract ballet to European and American public. His unique, cool and brilliant style enchanted or repulsed the ballet-loving audience all over the world, but nobody was left indifferent. His musicality was legendary. And his personality was huge, not easy to deal with. He was a genius.
After the performance, I came home and took this book off my shelf. I wanted to read it. It has a subtitle: A Dancer’s View of George Balanchine. The author was a ballerina herself, although most readers would probably recognize her name from the old movie The Red Shoes.
Shearer’s book is a biography of George Balanchine, one of the greatest choreographers of the 20th century, written from a dancer’s point of view. You won’t find a deep analysis here, but you’ll find most of Balanchine’s ballets, his collaborators, and the turbulent events of his life.
He was born in Russia in 1904. He matured with the 20th century. The Russian revolution found him a student of the St. Petersburg Ballet School. During the first years after the revolution, the young Mariinsy Theatre dancer performed and choreographed as much as he could. The trend continued after he left Russia.
He worked in Europe, and later in America, and always hungry for new jobs, he would stage dances for ballets and operas, music hall and drama, movie and circus. Once, he choreographed a show for a bunch of dancing elephants in tutus. Whatever the job was, he would take it.
He created a new ballet style, but his life, like any trailblazer's, wasn’t easy or simple. Shearer peppers her book with the names of dancers, artists, composers, and impresarios who came into Balanchine’s sphere, worked with him or for him, loved him or hated him. For the readers unconnected with the theatre world, such writing wouldn’t be very interesting. For me – it was fascinating, especially the first Russian period in Balanchine’s life.
I became a ballet fan when I was in university in Moscow. I never danced myself but I went to as many ballets as I could afford, and I read books about ballet. Every name Shearer mentions in her book was familiar to me, like a snippet of gossip about an old acquaintance. I inhaled those stories.
I know less about the European ballet history, so the later period of Balanchine’s life contained more names I didn’t know, and as a result was a bit drab.
On the whole, if you don’t like ballet or are not interested in it, don’t read this book. It would bore you to tears. If you do like ballet, it would be an engaging read, teeming with names of most famous theatrical people of the 20th century, with tons of little facts and quirky speculations. An absolute must for every ballet fan.
July 14, 2018
Moira Shearer's prose is charming and conversational, and makes for an enjoyable read when paired with such a fascinating subject as Balanchine. I was excited to read a biography of Balanchine from the perspective of a ballet dancer, expecting a technical analysis of his style and reflection on his impact on the modern repertoire. This...didn't...quite happen.
The 'dancer's perspective' occurred with sometimes fun, but more often random, anecdotes about the author's own life. It came across as a bit self-indulgent, and thus I would have liked the book more if my unfavorable opinion of the author (formed at the the pace of reading) hadn't gotten in the way!
One highlight was the eye-roll-inducing passage on how alllll dancers share a veeery special love of food... !!! Georges was STARVING in Russia, Moira! That's why he liked the bread in Monte Carlo!!!
The 'dancer's perspective' occurred with sometimes fun, but more often random, anecdotes about the author's own life. It came across as a bit self-indulgent, and thus I would have liked the book more if my unfavorable opinion of the author (formed at the the pace of reading) hadn't gotten in the way!
One highlight was the eye-roll-inducing passage on how alllll dancers share a veeery special love of food... !!! Georges was STARVING in Russia, Moira! That's why he liked the bread in Monte Carlo!!!
December 20, 2015
There are many biographies of George Balanchine. An overview of his life covers the familiar ground of his birth in St. Petersburg as Gyorgy Balanchivadze ; the audition at the Imperial Ballet School at 9; his abandonment there by his mother; his lack of interest in ballet until he saw a performance at the Mariinski; his love and expertise in music are retold with dispatch and punctuated with comments that reveal Balanchine's life and his relationship to the times in which he lived.
So what does Shearer add to this ouevre of ballet biographies and memoirs? Firstly, she writes from the perspective of a dancer, but also with a clarity of distance provided by a different country, culture and ballet tradition.
Secondly, she includes anecdotes from her own experience, or from personal interviews with dancers who worked with Balanchine. Thirdly, Shearer's writing is charming which is apparent in the warm delight she takes in telling the story, and of the many characters involved, particularly of those dancers of the generation preceding her own.
So what does Shearer add to this ouevre of ballet biographies and memoirs? Firstly, she writes from the perspective of a dancer, but also with a clarity of distance provided by a different country, culture and ballet tradition.
Secondly, she includes anecdotes from her own experience, or from personal interviews with dancers who worked with Balanchine. Thirdly, Shearer's writing is charming which is apparent in the warm delight she takes in telling the story, and of the many characters involved, particularly of those dancers of the generation preceding her own.
December 31, 2014
This book is pretty bad. Shearer interacted with Balanchine for one rehearsal and was so moved by the experience that she wrote a biography about him decades later. From what I can tell, she's factual and her chapters on Balanchine's early life are done well enough. Shearer can't stop injecting herself into the narrative though, and it's annoying. She spends a lot of time criticizing the writing styles of dance critics, and she adds little asides about how she can relate to whatever Balanchine was going through because of her experience in this or that film or stage production. I don't really understand the purpose of this book, and I wish Shearer had written a memoir about the Red Shoes instead.
February 16, 2012
highly highly recommended.
November 12, 2017
Moira Shearer on Balanchine and ballet? Delightful, colorful, loving, dishy.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews