What do you think?
Rate this book
The Quest of the Holy Grail
The noted author of From Ritual to Romance describes and analyzes the literature of the Grail cycle and surveys the leading theories about the origins and meaning of the legend. Her conclusion is that the Grail story is a confused and fragmentary record of a special form of nature worship, which, elevated to the dignity of a mystery, survived as a tradition. Appendix. Bibliography. Index.
172 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1913
5 people are currently reading
74 people want to read
About the author
Jessie Laidlay Weston
115 books16 followersJessie Laidlay Weston (1850–1928) was an independent scholar and folklorist, working mainly on mediaeval Arthurian texts.
Weston was the daughter of William Weston a tea merchant and member of the Salters' Company and his second wife, Sarah Burton, and named after his first wife Jessica Laidlay. Sarah, after giving birth to two more daughters died when Jessie was about seven. William remarried Clara King who gave birth to five more children. The elder siblings were born in Surrey, but youngest son Clarence was born in Kent. Jessie, her sister Frances and brother Clarence later moved to Bournemouth, where Jessie began her writing career, remaining there until around 1903. Her home at 65 Lansdowne Road still stands, as of 2010. Jessie studied in Hildesheim then Paris under Gaston Paris. She also studied at the Crystal Palace School of Art.
One of her first printed works was a lengthy sentimental verse called The Rose-Tree of Hildesheim. A narrative about "sacrifice and denial", it was modelled on the story of the Thousand-year Rose, which grows on a wall at Hildesheim Cathedral. Published in 1896, it was the title verse in an omnibus of her poems.
(from Wikipedia)
Weston was the daughter of William Weston a tea merchant and member of the Salters' Company and his second wife, Sarah Burton, and named after his first wife Jessica Laidlay. Sarah, after giving birth to two more daughters died when Jessie was about seven. William remarried Clara King who gave birth to five more children. The elder siblings were born in Surrey, but youngest son Clarence was born in Kent. Jessie, her sister Frances and brother Clarence later moved to Bournemouth, where Jessie began her writing career, remaining there until around 1903. Her home at 65 Lansdowne Road still stands, as of 2010. Jessie studied in Hildesheim then Paris under Gaston Paris. She also studied at the Crystal Palace School of Art.
One of her first printed works was a lengthy sentimental verse called The Rose-Tree of Hildesheim. A narrative about "sacrifice and denial", it was modelled on the story of the Thousand-year Rose, which grows on a wall at Hildesheim Cathedral. Published in 1896, it was the title verse in an omnibus of her poems.
(from Wikipedia)
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
August 11, 2018
I'm not persuaded!
December 27, 2022
After a series of in-depth, highly detailed books in which she first developed her Ritual Theory of the origins of the legend of the Holy Grail, the Arthurian scholar Jessie L. Weston (1850–1928) was at last able to present her challenging ideas in a form in which they could be understood by the general reader – a reader, at least, who was not averse to the ‘soft occultism’ propagated by the Theosophical Society and G.R.S. Mead’s Quest Society, which grew out of it.
Her book was, in fact, brought out as part of the Quest Series edited by Mead for the London publisher G. Bell & Sons; and was preceded by an article which she wrote for the first volume of his quarterly review, The Quest (1909–10). In this she expresses her view that the Grail was originally the sacred vessel of a pagan mystery religion, whose rituals had been “worked up into a story”; and that this story had been “remodelled on the lines of Christian Mysticism”, not always intelligently. Much of the article is devoted to attacking the theories of the Christian Hermeticist A.E. Waite, who consistently belittles the pre-Christian elements in the stories: “He cannot surely believe that under the Christian dispensation alone did man seek after God, and find Him?”
This argument with the advocates of a Christian Theory of Origin she continues in the fourth chapter of her 1913 book, concluding: “Whatever the Grail may be it is not a Christian relic; whatever the source of the story, it is not an ecclesiastical legend.” Although she gives greater weight to what she calls the Folk-lore Theory (the discussion of which occupies the fifth chapter), advocated by among others her late friend Alfred Nutt, she argues that this too is inadequate to explain the totality of the Grail symbolism: it is difficult, she writes, to accept “that a purely Folk-lore, food-providing vessel should be identified with the most sacred objects of the Christian Faith” unless it were, from the beginning, “surrounded with the atmosphere of mysterious sanctity befitting the holiest of relics”.
Her own Ritual Theory (“the view that sees in the Grail tradition as preserved to us the confused and fragmentary record of a special form of nature-worship, which, having been elevated to the dignity of a ‘mystery,’ survived in the form of a tradition”), designed to bridge the gap between paganism and Christian mysticism, occupies the final two chapters of what is an admirably concise and succinct presentation of her argument. With its summaries of the continental texts and stories, this is as near as Weston got to writing a Beginners Guide to the Grail Quest (even the quotations from the original texts are translated into English, for once!).
Along the way, Weston repeats the intriguing hints about the sources of her own theories which she first dropped in the second volume of her Perceval Studies (The Legend of Sir Perceval, Vol. 2: Studies Upon Its Origin, Development, and Position, in the Arthurian Cycle); theories which, though wedded to thorough textual criticism, have a clearly non-literary provenance: More than once, she tells us, she has lent her translation of the adventures of Gawain in the Grail Castle (which she considered to be based on the earliest, pagan versions) to friends whom she has reason to believe were familiar with occult traditions and practices; their invariable response is to remark: “This is the story of an initiation, told from the outside.”
The Grail stories and the initiation rituals which she believed are the groundwork of the romances were, like the doomed Albigensians and Templars and the misunderstood Troubadors and Alchemists, part of the “strange currents stirring” in the Middle Ages: “a stream of tradition, running as it were underground, which from time to time rises to the surface, only to be relentlessly suppressed.” This suppressed tradition she would explore more fully in her next (and most famous) book, From Ritual to Romance, whose reception among creative modernists would justify her belief that the Secret of the Grail is “above all a ‘human’ problem, a subject of profound human interest, and one which touches such deep springs of human thought and need that it requires to be handled by those whose interest lies in dealing with the workings of the soul, as much as with the expression of literary intelligence.”
There is more on Jessie Weston, Arthurian literature and religious symbolism in my Goodreads blog: Myth Dancing (Incorporating the Twenty Third Letter). A series of posts on Weston begins here: https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog...
Her book was, in fact, brought out as part of the Quest Series edited by Mead for the London publisher G. Bell & Sons; and was preceded by an article which she wrote for the first volume of his quarterly review, The Quest (1909–10). In this she expresses her view that the Grail was originally the sacred vessel of a pagan mystery religion, whose rituals had been “worked up into a story”; and that this story had been “remodelled on the lines of Christian Mysticism”, not always intelligently. Much of the article is devoted to attacking the theories of the Christian Hermeticist A.E. Waite, who consistently belittles the pre-Christian elements in the stories: “He cannot surely believe that under the Christian dispensation alone did man seek after God, and find Him?”
This argument with the advocates of a Christian Theory of Origin she continues in the fourth chapter of her 1913 book, concluding: “Whatever the Grail may be it is not a Christian relic; whatever the source of the story, it is not an ecclesiastical legend.” Although she gives greater weight to what she calls the Folk-lore Theory (the discussion of which occupies the fifth chapter), advocated by among others her late friend Alfred Nutt, she argues that this too is inadequate to explain the totality of the Grail symbolism: it is difficult, she writes, to accept “that a purely Folk-lore, food-providing vessel should be identified with the most sacred objects of the Christian Faith” unless it were, from the beginning, “surrounded with the atmosphere of mysterious sanctity befitting the holiest of relics”.
Her own Ritual Theory (“the view that sees in the Grail tradition as preserved to us the confused and fragmentary record of a special form of nature-worship, which, having been elevated to the dignity of a ‘mystery,’ survived in the form of a tradition”), designed to bridge the gap between paganism and Christian mysticism, occupies the final two chapters of what is an admirably concise and succinct presentation of her argument. With its summaries of the continental texts and stories, this is as near as Weston got to writing a Beginners Guide to the Grail Quest (even the quotations from the original texts are translated into English, for once!).
Along the way, Weston repeats the intriguing hints about the sources of her own theories which she first dropped in the second volume of her Perceval Studies (The Legend of Sir Perceval, Vol. 2: Studies Upon Its Origin, Development, and Position, in the Arthurian Cycle); theories which, though wedded to thorough textual criticism, have a clearly non-literary provenance: More than once, she tells us, she has lent her translation of the adventures of Gawain in the Grail Castle (which she considered to be based on the earliest, pagan versions) to friends whom she has reason to believe were familiar with occult traditions and practices; their invariable response is to remark: “This is the story of an initiation, told from the outside.”
The Grail stories and the initiation rituals which she believed are the groundwork of the romances were, like the doomed Albigensians and Templars and the misunderstood Troubadors and Alchemists, part of the “strange currents stirring” in the Middle Ages: “a stream of tradition, running as it were underground, which from time to time rises to the surface, only to be relentlessly suppressed.” This suppressed tradition she would explore more fully in her next (and most famous) book, From Ritual to Romance, whose reception among creative modernists would justify her belief that the Secret of the Grail is “above all a ‘human’ problem, a subject of profound human interest, and one which touches such deep springs of human thought and need that it requires to be handled by those whose interest lies in dealing with the workings of the soul, as much as with the expression of literary intelligence.”
There is more on Jessie Weston, Arthurian literature and religious symbolism in my Goodreads blog: Myth Dancing (Incorporating the Twenty Third Letter). A series of posts on Weston begins here: https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog...
Read
January 21, 2026Celtic myth and medieval Christianity--a heady and colorful mix for people curious about the Arthurian legends.
July 21, 2010
Overly technical. Written for scholars.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews