Interesting story of a court case that hit the papers a few times, when the Monty Python team were sued for depriving their producer. Mark Forstater, of income stemming from The Holy Grail film. I enjoyed following the story of the suddenly "reinterpreted" contract which had been accepted and adhered to for 40-odd years, at the point when the Pythons suddenly had a huge new sums flowing from Spamalot - the stage musical derived from the aforesaid Holy Grail film. There's good background and run up to the court case, with the making of the original movie as background, and the thoughts of various Python and associated participants, film-makers to interest Python fans and (with the unexplained absence of a key witness) minor conspiracy theorists.
The trial itself is quite short, so that section is not a dry account, indeed it is chilling (the cross-examination of Mr. Forsater by a bullying QC who seemed to know little about showbusiness), and incredible - some of the the statements made by the "nicest Python" in court. The video conference between the Pythons' original lawyer and the courts was a chaotic affair which is like one of the Pythons' own courtroom sketches - and worth the price in itself.
One for Python fans who don't mind their heroes showing they might well have feet of clay. As for the vilified producer who wins the case, there is a pyrrhic vctory, as the biggest winner are the legal profession and courts of chancery - as he makes much of the connection between his case and Dickens' classic, Bleak House.