What do you think?
Rate this book


328 pages, Hardcover
First published October 9, 2015
"This brief overview of contemporary discussions about sexuality... on the United States... must remain cursory and speculative. Rather than reaching a definitive conclusion, it suggests how debates that emerged in nineteenth-century German-speaking central Europe still structure discussions today. On the one hand, a modern, minoritizing, biologically based, liberal model of sexual orientation stands as a category comparable to gender and race. On the other hand, a model of a widespread, fluid, classically oriented, majoritizing, culturally based, aesthetically focused desire for members of one's own sex persists. Both models echo the writings of political activists, medical, psychiatriatric, sexological, and psychoanalytic scientists, and literary authors of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century German-speaking central Europe, many of whom may seem peripheral to the twenty-first century public, but whose thinking has helped construct the architecture of our most intimate desires" (p. 248-9).
"It is important to note here that although Kertbeny uses a vocabulary of race to make his point, this race is primarily based on culture—language, literature, poetry. Even if Kertbeny regards homosexuality as a race (or "nationality" in Austro-Hungarian parlance), that race is one that he and others can join through a shared cultural upbringing. It is a malleable identity that literature and culture can mold. For Kertbeny, as well as for many Hungarian nationalists, language, literature, and culture are the most important bearers of national identity. As a translator, he argues vigorously for "the consistent international representation of the intellectual interests of the Hungarian nation," including a foreign ministry that would represent the "national literary interests" to the outside world. Only in literature can one transmit national character: "every smaller language and literature must develop at home absolutely nationally, but must look for external mediation with the general culture via one of the languages of world culture." Because of the belief in the possibilities of acquiring a Magyar identity through language and culture, the Hungarian model avoids the essentializing and pathologizing features of Ulrichs's model. If this link between Hungarians and homosexuals did not leave many explicit traces in the literature, the hope for an identity based on culure and Bildung, rather than pure biology, is quite deeply engrained in many aspects of European thought and on some level it affected many of the early homosexual emancipation activists" (p. 126).