Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past” as Want to Read:
But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

But What If We're Wrong?: Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past

3.65  ·  Rating details ·  10,421 Ratings  ·  1,284 Reviews
We live in a culture of casual certitude. This has always been the case, no matter how often that certainty has failed. Though no generation believes there’s nothing left to learn, every generation unconsciously assumes that what has already been defined and accepted is (probably) pretty close to how reality will be viewed in perpetuity. And then, of course, time passes. I ...more
Audio, Unabridged
Published June 7th 2016 by Penguin Audio
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about But What If We're Wrong?, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Hannah Looking into the past with eyes colored by the present. (Using culture, science, ideas, etc.)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Kirsty
As the opening chapter questions whether we could be wrong about the existence of gravity, I thought this would be a book about philosophy and the nature of existence. Of course, I should have looked closely at the author's name - Chuck Klosterman writes about the arts and pop culture, so rather than questioning the nature of existence, mostly this book questions our value judgements on the arts and pop culture. The chapter on books asks just how wrong we can be about who will be the voice of th ...more
emma
Excuse me. I just have to go pat myself on the back for ninety minutes for having read nonfiction voluntarily. My brain is bigger than yours, and I am the greatest person alive.

I don’t run, so I don’t know what a runner’s high feels like and I never will and I never want to, but I imagine it’s a lot like finishing a nonfiction book you read without anyone making you. Because, like, wow. I feel like I just won a MacArthur grant, or discovered a new law of physics, or something.

Despite the fact t
...more
Jamie
Dec 16, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
3.5-4 stars

I loved this book up until about half way through. It was covering topics like string theory, the multiverse, and our understanding of gravity. One of my favorites- "As a species, the concept of infinity might be too much for us. I suspect the human conception of infinity is akin to a dog's conception of a clock". -love this!

Discussions with Tyson and Greene-Aristotle and Galileo make appearances throughout-I also loved the chapter on history- with Klosterman's saying, "history is def
...more
Sam Quixote
In his latest book, Chuck Klosterman takes a look at the present as if it were the distant past, posing some interesting thought experiments: what will people think of the early 21st century in 500 years’ time? Will rock music still be popular and who will be remembered as the epitome of the genre? Will team sports like football still be popular? Who will be remembered as the most significant writer of this time? Has science reached an impasse or are we about to discover a major new bountiful fi ...more
Casey
Apr 26, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Don't go into this book if you really expect to learn something or encounter firm opinions from Chuck Klosterman (except, of course, his wholly incorrect view on the movie Independence Day). I thought I might hate this book going by the first chapter, which seemed to talk in circles about doubt and certainty. Fortunately, subsequent sections are arranged around different themes, and the focus does Klosterman a world of good. Nobody wants to read nearly 300 pages of that annoying devil's advocate ...more
Justin
Jul 02, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was my first Klosterman book and my first nonfiction book in a minute as the kids say. I really liked most of the book. It's pretty abstract, there aren't any answers to the questions he's asking since we can't see into the future, but I enjoyed the discussion and trying to gaze into the crystal ball.

The premise of the book is trying to look at the present as if it were the past, basically putting ourselves into a time machine and looking back at our current times from a variety of angles.
...more
Benjamin
Jul 06, 2016 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
I really want to give this more stars, I should have liked it- but, ugh. Yes, I'm sure lots of the things we now believe about reality may one day be proven wrong, but so what? How does that effect our lives? Well, as the author states it doesn't because most people don't care. The shepherd in 1500 A.D. who was suddenly told the earth went around the sun and not vice versa, was shocked and then went back to his sheep. We're just the same, centuries from now when we finally unlock the secrets of ...more
Stevie Kincade
I don't always read non-SF/F but when I do, I like to make sure it's the kind of non-fiction that makes me incredibly annoying at parties. God, you should have seen me the year I read Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink", I could hammer the thought-candy from that book into any conversation about anything at all.

Gladwell's premise is that throughout history we have been completely wrong about everything SO, what things that we accept as completely true now, will we look back on in 500 years and laugh a
...more
Katie
Apr 25, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This was a fun book. I received an ARC in exchange for my review, and I have to say that I would strongly recommend this to anyone who loves to ask "What if?" This is one of those books you just can't take seriously at all, but if you're willing to follow the author down the hypothetical scenario rabbit hole, it's quite amusing. You will ponder who the next Kafka will be, whether the Beatles will still be historically important in the far future, whether there is another version of you (or multi ...more
Peter Derk
Feb 12, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Best thing I've read this year.

The premise is pretty simple. Basically, Klosterman spends most of a book...not PROVING that we're wrong about just about everything, but asking questions that make us think, "If I step outside myself for a second, I COULD be wrong."

You'd be amazed the places he goes with this. He starts with fucking gravity! STARTS with. Not proving that gravity is nonexistent as we experience it, but that it may be an emergent force, which is a force that results from other thing
...more
Eric Lin
Jun 27, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
You may expect this book to be filled with doubt (and it is), but even more so, it advocates humility.

In But What If We're Wrong?, Chuck Klosterman jumps from topic to topic, questioning some of the opinions that society has more or less reached consensus on. Some of these are objective (our understanding of gravity), and some are subjective (who will be considered the greatest writer of the 21th century?), but it's interesting to think about "Opinion" in the macro sense of what society believes
...more
Todd
Aug 08, 2016 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Every time I read an essay by Chuck Klosterman -- and, given my interest in music and pop culture, I've read a number of them -- I'm struck by his self-deprecating tone. It's the written equivalent of throat clearing and foot shuffling: parenthetical asides, wryly humorous footnotes, run-on digressions from his central point. It can be charming.

But in small doses, and in the right context. In "But What If We're Wrong?" it becomes, frankly, annoying.

The book's conceit is a good one: What will mat
...more
fortuna.spinning
Apr 09, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: audio, nonfiction
“History is defined by people who don’t really understand what they are defining.”

This was a really fascinating and thought-provoking read! Klosterman takes a sociological look at several cultural facets, asking sometimes bizarre, but poignant questions. I particularly liked the part about authors and writing (naturally!) and the section on the US Constitution. Overall, a great read!
Michael Buonagurio
I usually love reading Klosterman, but this book was difficult to get through and on the whole not enjoyable unfortunately. It's fun to listen to him on Bill Simmons' podcast present unorthodox views on sports or cultural events, and his celebrity profiles are always fresh and have a distinct slant to them. But I felt his writing style, which was unnecessarily convoluted at times, wasn't a great fit for this subject matter. High brow writing about low brow topics is where he seems to excel. It f ...more
Rob
Feb 14, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
There's a subset of readers who will adore Chuck Klosterman's most recent book, But What if We're Wrong?, and a second (likely larger) subset who will view it as frustrating and pointless intellectual masturbation. I'm firmly in the first camp, and not just because my job demands I have a high tolerance for frustrating and pointless intellectual masturbation. I've been a fan of Klosterman's for years, mainly because he speaks my middle-aged pop-culture-obsessed nerd lingo. And while that side of ...more
James Murphy
Oct 03, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is a terribly interesting book. Klosterman speculates about what in our present lives will still have significance in the far future and how it will be perceived. It's a book about perspectives and also a book of criticism. He devotes time to questions about which books of our time will still be read 200 or 300 yearss from now, what songs and artists will be perceived as epitomizing our age. What is the future of sports? What is the future of American democracy? Are we at the end of science ...more
Donna
Jun 06, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
No. No. No. I'm not sure what went wrong. I usually love books like this...really! This type of nonfiction, even the absurd, are books I enjoy. But this one....not so much. I think my main issue was that I did the audio and the author liked himself and his topics of discussion enough for both of us....way more than I ever could. He sounded like he was the greatest thing and everything was so important. Bottom line: I wasn't feeling it. He thought he was so witty, and that was such a huge turn of ...more
Trin
A book-long pointless intellectual exercise, but a really fun and interesting one. This is my favorite Klosterman in a while: it's both more serious and thoughtful, and funnier, than his last few efforts. If you'd like the experience of a truly excellent semi-sober dinner conversation with a smart, surprising companion but in book form, well -- here it is!
Holly
Jun 07, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2016-reads
The questions that obsess Klosterman are not ones that keep me up at night. A few years ago I tried to read Kathryn Schulz's Being Wrong and I hadn't been compelled to finish. But this was a lot of fun to read, and it required a lot of thinking (I claim to enjoy that, but sometimes this made my head hurt. Don't know if it was the thoughts or CK's meandering writing style.) He's sort of conducting Gedankenexperments, so I thought of those terms like "backcasting" and "hindcasting", but I don't kn ...more
D.L. Morrese
From the title and the blurb I expected this book would address basic assumptions that we, as a culture, seldom question but which are not necessarily true. It doesn't do that. Although there is a little about science and some philosophical underpinnings of the U.S. Constitution, most of the book looks at pop culture—fiction, TV, music, and sports—and asks if the assessments of contemporary critics will reflect how people of the future judge these things.

My initial reaction was something like, "
...more
Lorilin
Feb 09, 2018 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: arc
The premise: what if we're wrong about what we know "for sure" now, and how will we see our past selves in the future?

Klosterman discusses (and dissects) the concepts of gravity, the NFL, TV, art, and democracy, among others.

This book is well-researched and well-written...and I hated every minute of it. Klosterman comes across as self-important and arrogant. He makes his point...and then continues to explain it for another 30 pages. It's honest-to-God mental masturbation at its finest. I final
...more
Dunstan McNutt
Jun 20, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is my new favorite book. There are so many chapters that would work perfectly as introductory texts to so many disciplines (history, philosophy, science, philosophy of science, philosophy of history). I want everyone I know to read this book so we can talk about it. That is all.
Peter Tillman
Interesting premise, shaky execution, indifferent writing. Abandoned and returned. Not for me.
Hannah
Apr 13, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is a collection of essays and arguments revolving around a central theme--looking into the past with eyes colored by the present. Klosterman presents arguments ranging from future cultural popularity (who will define rock music--The Sex Pistols? Bob Dylan? Chuck Berry?) to scientific theories (will our theory of gravity seem as preposterous to future humans as the geocentric model of the universe seems to us?).

Klosterman's meditations kindled memories of a Shakespeare seminar I took in
...more
John Lamb
Jun 12, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
If you're the type of person who gets annoyed at conversations that seem unsolvable (i.e. "What if the color red I see isn't the color red you see?"), then do not read this book. However, if you're fascinated by these philosophical quandaries (Neil deGrasse Tyson calls them "beer conversations" in the book), then this book is for you. I love his overriding concept of trying to figure out how to today will be judged by tomorrow. At first I was worried that it might veer into "pot conversation" te ...more
Krista
Aug 20, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2016, nonfiction, essays
Before we can argue that something we currently appreciate deserves inclusion in the world of tomorrow, we must build that future world within our mind. This is not easy (even with drugs). But it's not even the hardest part. The hardest part is accepting that we're building something with parts that don't yet exist.

Reading But What If We're Wrong? Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past is like being a fly on the wall of Chuck Klosterman's pot-filled dormroom, listening in as he mean
...more
Ran
Jul 26, 2016 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 300s, nonfiction
Upon finishing this book (which admittedly took me longer than I Wear the Black Hat ), I laughed to myself. Boy, wouldn't getting Klosterman in a room with Stephen Kern be interesting?

In this book, Klosterman asks: "But what about the things we're all wrong about?" Klosterman asks us to consider what about our current present thinking may be possibly, completely, and utterly wrong, as all pre-1600 peoples were prior to empiricism, mathematization, etc - i.e. the scientific revolution.

The grea
...more
Anna
I found Klosterman’s ‘But What If We’re Wrong’ thought-provoking and unsatisfying in roughly equal measure. I haven’t read anything by him before and came across this book… somewhere. It’s another one that I can’t for the life of my remember how it ended up on my to-read list. The premise was obviously intriguing: what if we thought about the present as we do the past? This is broken down over a number of themes and tangents, including discussion of how likely rock music and team sports are to s ...more
Deb (Readerbuzz) Nance
This is a wonderfully refreshing idea for a book: how will the present look from the future? What will we think about the way we looked at sports and democracy and rock music? It's, of course, almost impossible to really imagine how things will look as we gaze back at the past from the future. It's intriguing to contemplate. Klosterman consults lots of his favorite armchair philosophers about these questions and the result is this little book.

Why, then, the average rating, you ask? I wish the b
...more
Melissa
I enjoyed the mental gymnastic and general brain trippiness of this book which looks at the present and all the things we take for granted as universally true through the lens of time and asks...In the future will we still feel the same about this as we do now, and what if a great many of the things we accept as fundamentally true at this time are looked back on as fundamentally wrong by the future. After all, every generation has felt like they have known 'the truth', but every future generatio ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
  • Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership
  • Deep Time:: How Humanity Communicates Across Millennia
  • Coming Home to the Pleistocene
  • Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage
  • Standard Operating Procedure
  • White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America
  • The World Is Sound: Nada Brahma: Music and the Landscape of Consciousness
  • Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature
  • This Is Where You Belong: The Art and Science of Loving the Place You Live
  • The Fires: How a Computer Formula, Big Ideas, and the Best of Intentions Burned Down New York City-and Determined the Future of Cities
  • Boys Among Men: How the Prep-to-Pro Generation Redefined the NBA and Sparked a Basketball Revolution
  • Shame and Wonder: Essays
  • The Encyclopedia of New York City
  • The Gunning of America: Business and the Making of American Gun Culture
  • The Revolution Was Televised: The Cops, Crooks, Slingers and Slayers Who Changed TV Drama Forever
  • The Assassination Complex: Inside the Government's Secret Drone Warfare Program
  • Extinction: How Life on Earth Nearly Ended 250 Million Years Ago
  • Gun Guys: A Road Trip
3,059 followers
Charles John "Chuck" Klosterman is an American pop-culture journalist, critic, humorist, and essayist. He was raised on a farm near Wyndmere, North Dakota and graduated from the University of North Dakota in 1994. After college he was a journalist in Fargo, North Dakota and later an arts critic for the Akron Beacon Journal in Akron, Ohio, before moving to New York City in 2002.

“When The Matrix debuted in 1999, it was a huge box-office success. It was also well received by critics, most of whom focused on one of two qualities—the technological (it mainstreamed the digital technique of three-dimensional “bullet time,” where the on-screen action would freeze while the camera continued to revolve around the participants) or the philosophical (it served as a trippy entry point for the notion that we already live in a simulated world, directly quoting philosopher Jean Baudrillard’s 1981 reality-rejecting book Simulacra and Simulation). If you talk about The Matrix right now, these are still the two things you likely discuss. But what will still be interesting about this film once the technology becomes ancient and the philosophy becomes standard? I suspect it might be this: The Matrix was written and directed by “the Wachowski siblings.” In 1999, this designation meant two brothers; as I write today, it means two sisters. In the years following the release of The Matrix, the older Wachowski (Larry, now Lana) completed her transition from male to female. The younger Wachowski (Andy, now Lilly) publicly announced her transition in the spring of 2016. These events occurred during a period when the social view of transgender issues radically evolved, more rapidly than any other component of modern society. In 1999, it was almost impossible to find any example of a trans person within any realm of popular culture; by 2014, a TV series devoted exclusively to the notion won the Golden Globe for Best Television Series. In the fifteen-year window from 1999 to 2014, no aspect of interpersonal civilization changed more, to the point where Caitlyn (formerly Bruce) Jenner attracted more Twitter followers than the president (and the importance of this shift will amplify as the decades pass—soon, the notion of a transgender US president will not seem remotely implausible). So think how this might alter the memory of The Matrix: In some protracted reality, film historians will reinvestigate an extremely commercial action movie made by people who (unbeknownst to the audience) would eventually transition from male to female. Suddenly, the symbolic meaning of a universe with two worlds—one false and constructed, the other genuine and hidden—takes on an entirely new meaning. The idea of a character choosing between swallowing a blue pill that allows him to remain a false placeholder and a red pill that forces him to confront who he truly is becomes a much different metaphor. Considered from this speculative vantage point, The Matrix may seem like a breakthrough of a far different kind. It would feel more reflective than entertaining, which is precisely why certain things get remembered while certain others get lost.” 13 likes
“The ultimate failure of the United States will probably not derive from the problems we see or the conflicts we wage. It will more likely derive from our uncompromising belief in the things we consider unimpeachable and idealized and beautiful. Because every strength is a weakness, if given enough time.” 9 likes
More quotes…