There's a scene in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass in which the Red Queen, having just led a chase with Alice in which neither seems to have moved from the spot where they began, explains to the perplexed "It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." Evolutionary biologists have used this scene to illustrate the evolutionary arms race among competing species. William Barnett argues that a similar dynamic is at work when organizations compete, shaping how firms and industries evolve over time.
Barnett examines the effects--and unforeseen perils--of competing and winning. He takes a fascinating, in-depth look at two of the most competitive industries--computer manufacturing and commercial banking--and derives some startling conclusions. Organizations that survive competition become stronger competitors--but only in the market contexts in which they succeed. Barnett shows how managers may think their experience will help them thrive in new markets and conditions, when in fact the opposite is likely to be the case. He finds that an organization's competitiveness at any given moment hinges on the organization's historical experience. Through Red Queen competition, weaker competitors fail, or they learn and adapt. This in turn heightens the intensity of competition and further strengthens survivors in an ever-evolving dynamic. Written by a leading organizational theorist, The Red Queen among Organizations challenges the prevailing wisdom about competition, revealing it to be a force that can make--and break--even the most successful organization.
Although, it is not an academic book, but it is grounded in strong academic traditions. Readers are exposed to mathematical models to quantify the key intuitions. Fundamentally, this book is about competition presenting another definition. I have personally liked this definition as it is more quantifiable and empirical as opposed to mainstream managers relying on "softer" data.
Readers should spend time in understanding the arguments presented here that my conflict with other knowledge domains. Ultimately, this book presents an additional perspective to see things.
Preface xi Acknowledgments xiii Why are Some Organizations More Competitive Than Others? 1 (13) ``Competitiveness'' Varies from Organization to Organization 3 (1) Organizations Are Intendedly Rational Adaptive Systems 4 (3) Organizations Compete with Similar Organizations 7 (1) What It Takes to Win Depends on a Context's Logic of Competition 8 (4) Organizations Learn a Context's Logic of Competition by Competing 12 (2) Logics of Competition 14 (32) Analyzing Logics of Competition 17 (11) Meta-Competition among Alternative Logics 28 (6) The Logic of Predation 34 (3) Discovering Logics of Competition 37 (6) Summary and Implications for the Model 43 (3) The Red Queen 46 (28) How Do Organizations Respond to Competition? 47 (3) The Red Queen as an Ecology of Learning Organizations 50 (9) Consequences of Constraint in Red Queen Evolution 59 (10) Killing the Red Queen through Predation 69 (3) Argument Summary 72 (2) Empirically Modeling the Red Queen 74 (16) Modeling ``Competitiveness'' as a Property of Organizations 75 (2) The Red Queen Model 77 (2) Modeling a Pure-Selection Process 79 (1) Modeling Myopia 80 (2) Modeling the Implications of Predation 82 (2) Modeling Organizational Founding 84 (1) Modeling Organizational Survival 85 (2) Comparisons to Other Ecological Models of Organizations 87 (3) Red Queen Competition Among Commercial Banks 90 (42) The Institutional Context of Twentieth-Century U.S. Commerical Banking 90 (7) Logics of Competition among U.S. Banks 97 (8) Specifying the Red Queen Model for Illinois Banks 105 (4) Estimates of the Bank Founding Models 109 (10) Estimates of the Bank Failure Models 119 (11) Summary of Findings 130 (2) Red Queen Competition Among Computer Manufacturers 132 (83) The Computer Industry and Its Markets 136 (2) Discovering Logics of Competition among Mainframe Computer Manufacturers 138 (32) Discovering Logics of Competition among Midrange Computer Manufacturers 170 (23) Discovering Logics of Competition among Microcomputer Manufacturers 193 (20) Summary of Findings 213 (2) The Red Queen and Organizational Inertia 215 (13) The Competition-Inertia Hypothesis 218 (4) The Red Queen and Inertia among Computer Manufacturers 222 (2) The Red Queen and the Rise and Fall of Organizations 224 (4) Some Implications of Red Queen Competition 228 (9) Managerial Implications of the Red Queen 230 (2) Research Implications of the Red Queen 232 (5) APPENDIX: DATA SOURCES AND COLLECTION METHODS 237 (8) Commercial Banks 237 (4) Computer Manufacturers 241 (4) Notes 245 (14) References 259 (16) Index 275
Choice Reviews
Barnett (Stanford Univ.) presents an excellent theoretical account of the evolution of competitiveness, supported by empirical evidence. The theory of Red Queen competition posits that company competitiveness requires that a firm perform better than its rivals within the context of the logics of competition, those being the principles that determine who can compete, how they compete, criteria for success or failure, and related consequences. Barnett thoroughly depicts the ecological model in which organizations interact and compete in an ongoing process of adapting to competitors' improvements. Generally, these adaptations either work toward improving the company's competitiveness as it learns the current context's logics of competition, or the adaptations do not work and the company becomes less competitive or fails. Barnett empirically models the theory in the commercial banking and computer manufacturing industries. Red Queen theory suggests that exposure to competition provides a major impetus to continued development of organizational capabilities. This ecological theory provides an excellent complement and contrast to many existing theoretical frameworks in strategic management. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduate through professional readers. Copyright 2008 American Library Association.
I liked this book since it presents a very different view of competition and moreover, competitiveness. Itprovided insights into how competitiveness evolves. It made me more aware of this thin line between constructive competitiveness and destructive competitiveness.