The only way for vintage romances to be effective is if the hero's feelings are clear through his words and actions. With only the heroine's point of view provided, the author has to show some chinks in the armor, otherwise the hero just looks cruel. Often, the hero looks cruel in this story, but the heroine brings a lot on herself. I'm still on the fence about this one.
This hero is a pediatric consultant for a country hospital. The heroine is his secretary. Heroine wanted to be a nurse, but had to drop out after a year when her mother died of cancer. Her general practicioner father flaked out and heroine had to run the household, attend secretarial school and put up with her entitled brothers and sister. In short, the selfish father (who is in Canada trying out a new life when the story opens) is the real villian.
Other villians? The hero's drunkard brother who is fired from his residency at the hospital for neglecting a young patient. Heroine has the audacity to ask the hero to forgive him and give him his job back because it would "upset father."
Heroine is quite audacious in other ways. She says things she doesn't mean. She goes out with guys she doesn't like because she doesn't want to hurt their feelings (and gets assaulted for her good intentions). She makes a pass at the hero who is tempted but rejects her. This seems more the audacity of youth rather than a personality trait, however.
She never sets up any boundaries with her family so that it's only good luck her father finds a kind widow to marry - thus saving her a move to Saskatchewan.
Honestly, no wonder the hero is cruel - heroine needs a minder more than a husband.
Still, I enjoyed the story and was interested in what everyone was going to do next. The sensibilities from 1977 are so different now.
The story has this title because the hero moves in next door to the heroine's household. He has a pool, so the heroine spends a lot of time in a bikini around it while watching the kids. Poor hero. No wonder he was cranky.