Pelagonius and Latin Veterinary Terminology in the Roman Empire

by James Noel Adams

The language of Latin veterinary medicine has never been systematically studied. This book seeks to elucidate the pathological and anatomical terminology of Latin veterinary treatises, and the general linguistic features of Pelagonius as a technical writer. Veterinary practice in antiquity cannot be related directly to that of the modern world. In antiquity a man could claim expertise in horse medicine without ever passing an examination. Owners often treated their own animals. The distinction between 'professional' and layman was thus blurred, and equally the distinction between 'scientific' terminology and laymen's terminology was not as clear-cut as it is today. The first part of the book is devoted to some of the non-linguistic factors which influenced the terminology in which horse diseases and their treatment were described.

708 pages, Leather Bound

First published June 1, 1995

Reviews

[James · Rating 5 out of 5]

If you want a thorough analysis of veterinary treatises from antiquity along social and philological grounds, this is your book. While focused on Pelagonius, it certainly is not limited to that one treatise. It does not extend as late as Geoponika, though, as it focuses on the Latin west and therefore does not carry past the collapse of the W. Roman empire.