a great book that made me prouder to be a convictional (versus nominal) Baptist
written to address that there are lamentably few convictional baptists, instead “many are insufficiently catechized into Baptist faith, history, biblical theological rationale, and practical and spiritual appeal” (p3). it helpfully sets baptists within an historical, confessional context.
divided into three sections,
- Foundations: answers the questions: where do Baptists come from? and what do they share with the catholic (i.e., universal) church? answers by (1) showing shared orthodox beliefs (nicean view of trinity, chalcedonian christology, christs work in his threefold office, etc), (2) placing baptists downstream of the reformation historically (takes the english separatist view of baptist origins) and theologically (specifically view of scripture and soteriology), (3) emphasizing baptist “crucicentrism” as an expression of its evangelicalism, and (3) demonstrating that “the Baptist understanding of the relation between the covenants is truly our defining theological commitment… [it] dictates every theological and practical distinctives of the Baptist tradition” (p49,57).
- Distinctives: starts with (1) liberty of conscience as “the most fundamental Baptist distinctive” defining it as “each individual person is responsible before God under the supreme lordship of Jesus Christ” (p61), before walking through (2) believers baptism, (3) congregationalism, (3) covenantal communion, and (4) religious liberty. highlights key biblical texts, supporting baptist historical writings/confessions, and ends each chapter with a clear, compelling conclusion.
- Practices: the unique set of Baptist distinctives results in (or should result in) many practices, but the authors highlight three, (1) corporate worship (“Worship should be free (not determined by the strictures of the established church), true (regulated by Scripture alone), and gos-pel-oriented (focused on Christ and his saving acts)” (p120), (2) a life of holiness (“Our individual and collective faith in Christ is formed in covenant relationship to God and issues forth in covenant responsibilities toward one another” (p142), and (3) the urgency of missions/evangelism (“The God who has ordained the end (the salvation of the elect) has also ordained the means of their salvation (the indiscriminate, global proclamation of the gospel)” (p154).
best parts:
- the emphasis on covenantal theology as foundational was useful framing. the claims of baptist theology isn’t eisegisis or a rejection of orthodoxy but ideally an effort to consistently apply scripture (as interpreted through their covenantal hermeneutic) to key areas of christian living (primarily ecclesiology)
- not afraid to use the word “sacrament” when discussing baptism/communion (provides an explanation of why on p74-80)
- “low church liturgy”: much of the discussion on worship is taken from emerson and stamps essay “Liturgy for Low-Church Baptists”, and it’s a helpful response to the stereotypical, modern SBC-Baptist disdain for any form of worship that involves anything that smells of “high-church”. they lay out that all churches have a liturgy, so the question is will that liturgy be formed by scripture and orderly. they further lay out the limits to what they call “frontier liturgy” (the typical baptist: music, sermon, invitation) and lay out benefits of historic liturgies for baptists. even have a section on family worship!!
could be better
- in an attempt to represent “Baptists” more broadly (well except for anabaptists, see p5), has to paint with a broad brush at times. for example, includes a mention of dispensationalism as a covenant theology held by some Baptists without any comment on the view. but if that show of inclusivism leads more dispys to read this book then i guess i can be okay with that…