Luke and Acts

The New Testament: An Introduction #2

by Paul Nadim Tarazi

The title "Introduction" does not do justice to the contents of this volume, for while it provides the historical background and overview expected of an introduction, it also delves into details one would expect to find only in a full-fledged commentary.

The first section answers the broader questions of Luke and Acts: What prompted Luke to write his two-volume work and why did he write it in two volumes? Why did Luke, who knew and used Mark as a source, believe a second gospel was necessary? Why is the Holy Spirit so much more prominent in Luke-Acts than it was in Mark? What other sources - such as "Q" - did Luke use?

After giving the reader a clear overall picture of Luke and Acts, Tarazi devotes the remainder of the book to detailed exegesis.Luke and Acts is no exception. The reader will find convincing explanations for the parable in Luke 16 where Jesus praises an "unjust steward," Jesus' call for division rather than peace in Luke 12:51 and the apparently abrupt ending of Acts which has led many to suggest that the real ending was lost. Countless other features of the Biblical text are also discusses, including frequent corrections of misleading English translations and detailed explanations of how Luke used the written sources available to him.

This is the second of a four-volume series that will cover John and Revelation in Volume III, and Matthew and the creation of the canon in Volume IV.

The Rev. Dr Paul Nadim Tarazi is Professor of Old Testament at St Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary.

Genres: Theology, Religion

First published May 16, 2001

Reviews

[Charles · Rating 4 out of 5]

The second book to Fr Tarazi's Introduction to the New Testament collection. This book focus on Luke's work while maintaining a strong Pauline connection. As a whole the collection would be scandalizing to many Protestants and Orthodox. But if one digs in these works, I believe one will find much profit. Fr. Tarazi is a first class scholar and he writes like one. If one will examine what he says they will find merit even if not complete agreement.