The Dauphin Louis XVII: The Riddle Of The Temple

by G. Lenôtre

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

408 pages, Paperback

Published May 4, 2005

About the author

Pseudonym of Louis Léon Théodore Gosselin.

Reviews

[Liam Ostermann · Rating 3 out of 5]

I am not sure that I read this particular book on Louis XVII I read quite a number of books about him in my teenage years, most of them even for the 1970s antique in nature. They were all great fun but I didn't believe a word of their complex conspiracy theories because ultimately none of them could provide a convincing reason why, if you go the trouble of rescuing a valuable child who is king of FRance, you then go off and hide away for decades, apprentice him to a watchmaker etc. It is the same problem that all pretenders whether they be Russia's false Dimitri's in the 16th century or Romanov children saved from Ipatiev house in the 20th; the Princes in the Tower in England; the lost king Sebastian of Portugal, or the dauphin in France, no one can ever satisfactorily explain the years between their death and reappearance.

Of course the lack of satisfactory explanations is down to the fact that all these stories are bollox. Amusing bollox, sometimes creative bollox, almost always supported by nothing more than a desire for it to be true.

In the Dauphin's case his death was proven (as much as such things can be proven) when the DNA of the Dauphin's heart in the Basilica of St. Denis in Paris was found to match that of Marie Antoinette. More importantly it was shown the other claimants had no DNA link with her. Perhaps not 100% proof but rather like the bodies discovered outside Ekaterinburg while it may not be 100% proven that they are the murdered Russian imperial family and their servants you have to say who else those bodies linked by DNA to Prince Phillip are.

The whole story of the dauphin's little heart and his DNA is told in a wonderful book 'The LOst King of France' by Deborah Cadbury.

As for this book and all those others I found in second hand Dublin bookshops? Well they were marvellous fun and the pre WWI editions were very beautiful. Of course they passed out of my ownership half a century ago. I'd happily buy those antique editions again but a reprint seems silly. Still they fed my early love of history and worlds beyond Dublin quaysides where I bought these books. Perhaps I am reviewing this book in memory of the vanished Dublin in which I grew up half-a-century ago. I wouldn't wish it on today's Dublin youth but it was mine and is as vanished as the pre 1789 France that those who dreamed of finding a lost dauphin wanted to return to.

[Bernard Pauwels · Rating 3 out of 5]

J’ai lu la version française... un peu long et dur si on n’est pas familier avec l’histoire de la révolution française et toutes les tribulations qui la suivent. Le mystère et les mystifications son bien expliquées, pourtant l’enigme reste.

[Jill · Rating 4 out of 5]

It's interesting to read this book now, since DNA testing was done in 2000 that shows what happened to the Dauphin. In this work, written in 1921, Lenotre argues for the theory that the Dauphin was smuggled out of the prison and the child who died was a decoy. He doesn't claim that any of the pretenders who popped up over the years were the real prince, but he strongly believes a switch did occur. Read some of the post-2000 publications that discuss the results of the DNA testing first; that way, you'll appreciate just how convincingly Lenotre writes what he believes.