Debate abounds on the future of Israel and Israel's relation to the church, not only between dispensationalists and non-dispensationalists, but among dispensationalists themselves. In the past that debate has sometimes been acrimonious, and proponents of the differing viewpoints have found little common ground. In recent years, however, views have been modified and developed so that the dialogue is increasingly by cooperation and a mutual exploration of diverse ideas. The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism is intended to enlighten the debate in that same irenic spirit. The book is solidly dispensational in perspective in affirming that the Old Testament prophecies are completely fulfilled in the future, that the nation of Israel has a prophetic future, and that Israel is not the church. Dr. Saucy departs from classic dispensationalism, however, in showing that (1) the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy begins in the present church age, and (2) the church is not a parenthesis in God's program but represents a continuity with the Old Testament messianic program. This modified dispensationalism seeks to satisfy many of the objections of non-dispensational approaches to eschatology while retaining the crucial elements of biblical interpretation that characterize dispensational thought.
I enjoyed this book. In my opinion it teaches and defends a better dispensationalism than the classical or revised variety.
It defends the oneness of the people of God under the new covenant, the present and future aspects of the kingdom, the future role of Israel among the nations, the importance of a straightforward understanding of OT prophecy, etc.
Very in depth and organized presentation. Some points are not convincing but overall gives a great resource for those who want a biblical explanation for their theological system.
“The Case of Progressive Dispensationalism: The Interface Between Dispensational and Non-Dispensational Theology” by Robert Saucy is a helpful guide to understanding the fundamental issues at play between those dispensationalists who see more continuity between the Testaments and those who see more discontinuity. Saucy makes the case for large swaths of agreement between the theological camps, but he does not pull any punches when he argues that traditional dispensationalists have simply gone too far in their view of the Church here and now, the Churches role in society, the use of Old Testament texts in the New Testament, just to name a few issues.
This is an intermediate level book, and I would only recommend it to someone who is willing to roll up their sleeves and to think deeply about these important issues. But for those who take up the challenge, their understanding and appreciation of God’s plan for His people, both Israel and the Church, will be rewarded. Happy reading!