Recovering Theological Hermeneutics: An Incarnational-Trinitarian Theory of Interpretation

by Jens Zimmermann

In this study, Jens Zimmermann aims to recount the history of Protestant hermeneutics while taking seriously some of the issues raised by contemporary critical thought. He begins by considering some of the basic principles of Protestant biblical interpretation from the Reformation era, focusing particularly on the work of Martin Luther and Matthias Flacius. In the second section, he offers an appraisal of postmodern philosophical thought and its secular nature. Zimmerman concludes that while there is some validity to the issues raised by contemporary philosophers, a Trinitarian approach offers a viable method for recovering a theory of interpretation that is both philosophically sound and theologically informed.

Genres: Theology, Philosophy

352 pages, Hardcover

First published December 1, 2004

About the author

Jens Zimmermann (b. 1965) is a Christian philosopher and theologian who specializes in hermeneutics and the philosophical and theological roots of humanism. He is currently J.I. Packer Chair of Theology at Regent College.

Reviews

[Christopher G. · Rating 4 out of 5]

Jens Zimmerman traces the progression of philosophical and theological hermeneutics through the premodern, modern, and postmodern eras by examining the conclusions of the most influential contributors of each period. From the premodern emphasis on relationship with God, hermeneutics has now progressed to a godless ontology with an emphasis on self knowledge with subjective understanding. Contrary to the current evangelical belief that postmodern hermeneutics is superior to the methods and conclusions of premodern and modern scholars, Zimmerman advocates for a return to premodern hermeneutics and its relational, trinity-centric focus.

Considering the scope of the subject matter and the numerous individuals that Zimmerman drew from, the book has been condensed very well into the essential concepts that influenced change in hermeneutical thought through the progression of time. However, due to the number of philosophical views that Zimmerman draws from and makes reference to, it becomes difficult to keep them organized, especially with a limited background in philosophical studies.

I have a limited background in philosophy so I found this to be a challenge to read and assess. It might be deserving of five stars if my overall comprehension of the material was better on the first reading.