What do you think?
Rate this book
Imperial Justice: Africans in Empire's Court
Imperial Justice explores the imperial control of judicial governance and the adjudication of colonial difference in British Africa. Focusing on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the colonial regional Appeal Courts for West Africa and East Africa, it examines how judicial discourses of native difference and imperial universalism in local disputes influenced practices of power in colonial settings and shaped an evolving jurisprudence of Empire.
Arguing that the Imperial Appeal Courts were key sites where colonial legal modernity was fashioned, the book examines the tensions that permeated the colonial legal system such as the difficulty of upholding basic standards of British justice while at the same time allowing for local customary divergence which was thought essential to achieving that justice. The modernizing mission of British justice could only truly be achieved through recognition of local exceptionality and difference. Natives who appealed to the Courts of Empire were entitled to the same standards of justice as their 'civilized' colonists, yet the boundaries of racial, ethnic, and cultural difference somehow had to be recognized and maintained in the adjudicatory process. Meeting these divergent goals required flexibility in colonial law-making as well as in the administration of justice. In the paradox of integration and differentiation, imperial power and local cultures were not always in conflict but were
sometimes complementary and mutually reinforcing.
The book draws attention not only to the role of Imperial Appeal Courts in the colonies but also to the reciprocal place of colonized peoples in shaping the processes and outcomes of imperial justice. A valuable addition to British colonial literature, this book places Africa in a central role, and examines the role of the African colonies in the shaping of British Imperial jurisprudence.
Arguing that the Imperial Appeal Courts were key sites where colonial legal modernity was fashioned, the book examines the tensions that permeated the colonial legal system such as the difficulty of upholding basic standards of British justice while at the same time allowing for local customary divergence which was thought essential to achieving that justice. The modernizing mission of British justice could only truly be achieved through recognition of local exceptionality and difference. Natives who appealed to the Courts of Empire were entitled to the same standards of justice as their 'civilized' colonists, yet the boundaries of racial, ethnic, and cultural difference somehow had to be recognized and maintained in the adjudicatory process. Meeting these divergent goals required flexibility in colonial law-making as well as in the administration of justice. In the paradox of integration and differentiation, imperial power and local cultures were not always in conflict but were
sometimes complementary and mutually reinforcing.
The book draws attention not only to the role of Imperial Appeal Courts in the colonies but also to the reciprocal place of colonized peoples in shaping the processes and outcomes of imperial justice. A valuable addition to British colonial literature, this book places Africa in a central role, and examines the role of the African colonies in the shaping of British Imperial jurisprudence.
226 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2013
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
February 16, 2026
n Imperial Justice: Africans in Empire's Court zeigt Bonny Ibhawoh, dass koloniale Gerichte keine Randinstitutionen waren, sondern Laboratorien imperialer Macht. Zwischen universalem Anspruch und „nativer Differenz“ entstand eine flexible Justiz, die Herrschaft stabilisierte und zugleich von Afrikanern aktiv mitgeformt wurde. Ein präziser, entlarvender Blick auf die juristische Architektur des Empire.
October 6, 2014
Imperial Justice offers interesting and engaging insights into the workings of the British imperial legal system. The legal case histories presented in the book are compelling. They tell the story of colonial law and justice from the perspectives of both the colonizer and colonized. This is framed in terms of the tension between what Ibhawoh calls "imperial legal universalism" promoted by the Privy Council and the construction of local difference by native tribunals in colonial outposts.
The book argues that the workings of imperial justice required both the accommodation and containment of native difference. Ibhawoh links this historical paradox with present-day tension in the making of global legal culture and the work of supranational human rights courts such as the International Criminal Court, the African Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.
The key shortcoming of the book, however, is that it does not go far enough with this comparative analysis between imperial legal universalism and contemporary globalization of legal culture. This potentially interesting issue is confined to only a few pages in the concluding chapter. Some of the arguments the book makes about the connections between historical and present-day global legal culture also seem far-fetched.
Nonetheless, scholars and students of legal history, imperial studies and international law will find this book useful and refreshing in its scope and approach.
The book argues that the workings of imperial justice required both the accommodation and containment of native difference. Ibhawoh links this historical paradox with present-day tension in the making of global legal culture and the work of supranational human rights courts such as the International Criminal Court, the African Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.
The key shortcoming of the book, however, is that it does not go far enough with this comparative analysis between imperial legal universalism and contemporary globalization of legal culture. This potentially interesting issue is confined to only a few pages in the concluding chapter. Some of the arguments the book makes about the connections between historical and present-day global legal culture also seem far-fetched.
Nonetheless, scholars and students of legal history, imperial studies and international law will find this book useful and refreshing in its scope and approach.
May 7, 2014
Interesting perspective. No strong argument though. Jcpc is an interesting court I definitely learned that. Interesting though unconvinced about connection to international law.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews