What do you think?
Rate this book
The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability
In a series of comparative essays on a range of texts embracing both high and popular culture from the early modern era to the contemporary period, The Ideology of Genre counters both formalists and advocates of the "death of genre," arguing instead for the inevitability of genre as discursive mediation. At the same time, Beebee demonstrates that genres are inherently unstable because they are produced intertextually, by a system of differences without positive terms. In short, genre is the way texts get used. To deny that genres exist is to deny, in a sense, the possibility of reading; if genres exist, on the other hand, then they exist not as essences but as differences, and thus those places within and between texts where genres "collide" reveal the connections between generic status, interpretive strategy, ideology, and the use-value of language.
Hardcover
First published August 11, 1994
11 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
December 6, 2012
Yes, it's excellent--three of my four comps essays depend on it.
February 19, 2017
What is 'genre'? If you answers "fiction" or "nonfiction" or "scifi" or "romance," then you need to read this book, because it will have you rethinking everything you thought you knew about genre.
This is an excellent work for anyone reading literature. It lays out genre as a process and not a static system of categorization and "typing" of species, which by the time this book was published was already common knowledge among people who nerdily obsess about this kind of thing, and not common knowledge at all for the public. Genre for Beebee is a question of power, of ideology, which is why we have things like the "canon" still controlling the curriculum.
What Beebee does so well is riddle the history and theory of genre with funny details, such as his description of romance novel covers: "Need I describe [them]? A half-naked man and a half-naked woman in some sort of embrace, with a castle or cypress tree or clipper ship or mountain range in the background, perhaps a sword covering the pudenda..." (3) I don't often laugh out loud reading academic books, but little snippets like these had me rolling even when it became dense. Chapter 7 has this lovely meta-snippet: "Not clear is the purpose of this writing which I am not giving to the world... There remains the bizarre possibility that a young researcher desperate for publishable material planted a hearing device on one of these two and transcribed their ravings... It is even more probable to assume that the author was simply fudging her data, desperately hoping that her inferior creative effort would appear before the eyes of her tenure committee in the raiments of the loftier genre of research." (Ouch!)
I also appreciate the way Beebee lays out heavy thinkers (Derrida, Althusser) in a way that is not only completely accessible but sets aside some of the silly academic infighting for the real stakes. He was perhaps overly harsh on Marie-Louise Pratt, but I'm sure that could be a result of the academic genre of hating on someone at least once in your scholarship to prove your intellectual superiority, like two lions gnawing off the other's paw.
That aside, this was overall a truly insightful and necessary book.
This is an excellent work for anyone reading literature. It lays out genre as a process and not a static system of categorization and "typing" of species, which by the time this book was published was already common knowledge among people who nerdily obsess about this kind of thing, and not common knowledge at all for the public. Genre for Beebee is a question of power, of ideology, which is why we have things like the "canon" still controlling the curriculum.
What Beebee does so well is riddle the history and theory of genre with funny details, such as his description of romance novel covers: "Need I describe [them]? A half-naked man and a half-naked woman in some sort of embrace, with a castle or cypress tree or clipper ship or mountain range in the background, perhaps a sword covering the pudenda..." (3) I don't often laugh out loud reading academic books, but little snippets like these had me rolling even when it became dense. Chapter 7 has this lovely meta-snippet: "Not clear is the purpose of this writing which I am not giving to the world... There remains the bizarre possibility that a young researcher desperate for publishable material planted a hearing device on one of these two and transcribed their ravings... It is even more probable to assume that the author was simply fudging her data, desperately hoping that her inferior creative effort would appear before the eyes of her tenure committee in the raiments of the loftier genre of research." (Ouch!)
I also appreciate the way Beebee lays out heavy thinkers (Derrida, Althusser) in a way that is not only completely accessible but sets aside some of the silly academic infighting for the real stakes. He was perhaps overly harsh on Marie-Louise Pratt, but I'm sure that could be a result of the academic genre of hating on someone at least once in your scholarship to prove your intellectual superiority, like two lions gnawing off the other's paw.
That aside, this was overall a truly insightful and necessary book.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews