Watts and Bahill-engineeers by vocation, baseball fans by avocation-have devised a series of experiments that put some of baseball's most cherished myths to the test. The result is a highly informative and entertaining guide that combines absorbing anecdotes and historical developments with research findings to provide the scientific slant on some classic baseball conundrums. You'll find the details on: the mechanics and physics of pitching and hitting; why the curveball curves; the flyball and the effect of backspin and topspin on its flight; and much more.
For physicist baseball fans (and you know who you are) this is a great book. I can't speak for the physics, but it is chock full (probably a physics term) of data, formulae, and other physics references.
For the average baseball fan (that's me) there is a lot of good information, and a lot of probably good information that can be skipped without losing continuity.
Answering scientifically questions like "Can a ball can actually curve (or rise) or is it an illusion?", "What's the proper weight for a bat?", and "What is one factor in eyesight that can differentiate a major league batter from prospects?"
I really enjoyed the book in whole, but at times there is a lot of physics that must be read through to get to the conclusions/results of the studies.
In this age of sabermetrics the information is welcome. And if you just skip the stuff only physicists can understand it's not only a good read but a quick read.
The author's might think they've made their subject "accessible" but they might not succeed with folks who hated high school science. Here's a physics book that might keep people interested in Newton's laws and Bernoulli principals. Two engineers give the background on why curve balls curve and knuckle balls knuckle. It is not an optical illusion as anyone who has really tried to hit either will attest. Brought back many memories, some good and some not so. The end of the book turns to statistics and rating players from different eras. The engineers may not like it so much, but the economists will probably like it more so.
I'm still struck that a batter has .4 seconds before a 100 mph fast ball hits the catcher's mitt. Makes the .58 seconds you have for a 70 mph one seem liesurely!