Preface Beautiful motion. The unity of dance & religion The breakup of unity Enmity between dance & religion Religious dance: influences Religious dance: harmony The theological aesthetics of the dance Movements & countermovements. Holy play The breakup of unity The enmity between religion & theater Influences: harmony The theological aesthetics of the drama Beautiful words. Holy words The breakup of unity The rejection of the word by religion Influences toward harmony The theological aesthetics of the word The pictorial arts: The fixation of an idea as a holy image Unhindered pictorial representation The prohibition of images & the iconoclastic controversy The holy image: influences The house of God & the house of man. The building of the house of God The house of God becomes a human house: alienation & conflict Influences toward harmony The theological aesthetics of building Music & religion. Holy sound The transitional structure Discord Influences Harmony The theological aesthetics of music Theological aesthetics. Paths & boundaries The republic of the arts The image of God The theology of the arts Bibliography Index
Gerardus van der Leeuw was a Dutch historian and philosopher of religion. He is best known for his work Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology, an application of philosophical phenomenology to religion. It was first published in 1933 under the German title Phänomenologie der Religion and translated into English in 1938. From 1945–1946 van der Leeuw was minister of Education of the Netherlands for the Labour Party. Before the war he had been a member of the conservative Christian Historical Union.
This book may have been assigned for the first psychology class I took at Union Theological Seminary in New York, a class taught by a teacher with considerable interest in aesthetics. Later I was to read the more philosophical van der Leeuw, his Religion in Essence and Manifestation, with little profit. This book was more accessible in parts.
For my religious studies class at CNU (RSTD 312 - Religion & Art).
I absolutely despise this book. Whether because of the author's original intent in his native Dutch or because of the poor translation or through some combination of the two, I either do not understand or completely disagree with everything I have read.
Sacred and Profane Beauty was possibly the most thought-provoking book I've read in years. In the end, VanderLeeuw and I will differ theologically [I think] in ways that affect his thesis. However, this did not prevent me from enjoying and benefiting from his work.