Jump to ratings and reviews

Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures

This anthology collects some of the most current research and reflection on the complex interactions between religion and computer-mediated communications (CMC). The contributions cohere around the central question: how will core religious understanding of identity, community and authority shape and be (re)shaped by the communicative possibilities of Web. 2.0? The authors address these questions in three distinct ways: through contemporary empirical research on how diverse traditions across the globe seek to take up the technologies and affordances of contemporary CDC; through investigations that place these contemporary developments in larger historical and theological contexts; and through careful reflection on the theoretical dimensions of research on religion and CMC.--From cover, p. [4].

326 pages, Hardcover

First published February 8, 2012

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Pauline Hope Cheong

6 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
8 (72%)
3 stars
2 (18%)
2 stars
1 (9%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Sara.
1,170 reviews
October 9, 2013
This book was not quite what I was looking for, though the essay, "The Immanent Internet Redux," by Bernie Hogan and Barry Wellman, supplied the following quote:

"The ethereal internet light that previously dazzled has now dimmed to a soft glow permeating everyday concerns. We have moved from a world of internet wizards to a world of ordinary people routinely using the internet. The internet has become an important part of people's lives, but not a special part. It has become the utility of the masses rather than the plaything of computer scientists. It has become the infrastructure for a variety of computer-supported communications media, and not just the specialized conveyor of e-mail, Facebook, or any specific digital medium" (57).

In addition, more rigorous proof-reading and editing would have contributed to a cleaner, clearer read of this collection.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review