Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Daoism and Anarchism: Critiques of State Autonomy in Ancient and Modern China

Rate this book
This volume in the Contemporary Anarchist Studies series focuses on anti-statist critiques in ancient and modern China and demonstrates that China does not have an unchallenged authoritarian political culture.

Treating anarchism as a critique of centralized state power, the work first examines radical Daoist thought from the 4th century BCE to the 9th century CE and compares Daoist philosophers and poets to Western anarchist and utopian thinkers. This is followed by a survey of anarchist themes in dissident thought in the People's Republic of China from 1949 to the present. A concluding chapter discusses how Daoist anarchism can be applied to any anarchist-inspired radical critique today.

This work not only challenges the usual ideas of the scope and nature of dissent in China, it also provides a unique comparison of ancient Chinese Daoist anarchism to Western anarchist. Featuring previously untranslated texts, such as the 9th century Buddhist anarchist tract, the Wunengzi, and essays from the PRC press, it will be an essential resource to anyone studying anarchism, Chinese political thought, political dissent, and political history.

304 pages, Paperback

First published August 9, 2012

4 people are currently reading
157 people want to read

About the author

John A. Rapp

3 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (25%)
4 stars
15 (53%)
3 stars
6 (21%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Benjamin Mitchell.
11 reviews5 followers
November 2, 2016
There was some really interesting information here and it introduced me to a lot of figures I'd not previously known about and the translations were quite valuable. Though as much as I'm interested in the intersections of Daoism and Anarchism, I do feel like the author made some special pleading to make his case in a number of points. Though this may have seemed odd to me because I'm not more versed in the broader literature.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.