Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Yale Contemporary Law Series

Accidental Justice: The Dilemmas of Tort Law (Revised)

Rate this book
A woman suffers paralyzing injuries in a car accident but fails in court to prove the other driver's fault. She loses her case and is left bankrupt as well as maimed. An intoxicated man stumbles in the path of a subway train. He sues the local transit authority and wins a $9 million judgment. Real-life tort (or accident) cases like these inspire outrage against a system that seems frustratingly slow, inequitable, and expensive. In this even-handed and fascinating book, two leading tort experts explain to lay readers the strengths and weaknesses of our tort law system. Peter Bell and Jeffrey O'Connell demystify tort law and bring to life the process of tort litigation.

The roots of tort law lie in human suffering, maimed bodies, shattered spirits, and extinguished lives, say the authors. They discuss tort law's compensatory and deterrent functions; its delays, fortuity, and high transaction costs (mostly in lawyer's fees); and its role in discouraging harmful―as well as, on occasion, useful―activities. In a discussion of mass toxic tort cases, the authors investigate the ability of the courts to deal adequately with huge suits (related to breast implants or tobacco-related illnesses, for example) that involve massive numbers of claimants. Bell and O'Connell conclude with an objective review of such current reform enactments and proposals as no-fault insurance, caps on damages, and contingency fee reform.

283 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1997

3 people are currently reading
9 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (10%)
4 stars
5 (50%)
3 stars
3 (30%)
2 stars
1 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Kaitlyn.
156 reviews13 followers
October 2, 2013
The book was interesting but it seemed very repetitive. I understand that tort law is very convoluted but it seemed to make a point on one page and on the next page have an argument against it. I learned a lot but it was a bit dense.
45 reviews1 follower
Read
August 9, 2011
Awesome book, minus the retard drunk guy who fell in a whole.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.