Didn't find much practical stuff in it. A lot of the articles were more like speculative pieces about creative writing in academia, offering no hard evidence and discussing things in abstract.
I did, however, learn a little bit, and that's mostly because a few of the articles articulated what I had long suspected about the feasibility of teaching creative writing.
The short answer: you can teach students creative writing. Really. Can't teach them how to be original, but you can teach them strategies and conditions to be original.
Overall, it was more a waste of time than anything.
Of all the essays, only three were worth reading and inspired discussion. These are the ones by Uppal, Lehay and the joint one with Bizzaro and McClanahan. The one about Box Office Poison by Wendy Bishop was passably interesting. All in all, too many misses, not enough hits.
I was glad to read anything on the pedagogy of creative writing, and especially liked the Bishop/Armstrong and Cross pieces, but I felt too often that this collection of essays brought up problems without offering any possible solutions.