In my journey to read something from every country, I stumbled upon this gem of a satire that showed me (if I ever needed it!) that most countries with an autocratic past are the same, despite the differences in culture and geographical location. "O meu poeta" ("My Poet") is a sharp satire of Cape Verdean society in the post-independence period. The story revolves around an unnamed poet who functions as a symbolic figure representing both the artist and the intellectual in a society full of contradictions.
The novel's premise is a biography (a "profile") of the Poet, requested by a journalist and intended to be published in one of the country's major magazines. The task to compile this profile falls to the Poet's secretary, who follows him around and notes all his actions, be they professional, political, or even personal. The Poet's story starts from the closure of the tavern he frequents - The Closed Retreat (O Retiro Fehado), "a bar elevated to the category of municipal institution". To save this tavern, a commission is formed to convince the municipality to reopen it or, if not possible, to fly the municipal flag at half mast (!) as a sign of mourning. In fact, the commission is called... The Mourning Commission, and the Poet is elected its president.
If this summary doesn't tell you how satirical this book is, I don't know what will. I'm sad that it hasn't been translated into English, so that many more people can read it.
The themes in this book hit home. As someone coming from a former authoritarian country, some of the outcomes of independence felt familiar. There’s a clear critique of the post-independence regime. Though the party claims not to be totalitarian (because "they don’t take 100% of the vote"), the opposition is artificial and powerless. The essential condition for a true opposition is its independence from power, which is lacking. People don’t know how to oppose the regime, or they choose not to, preferring peace and routine instead of active involvement in a society in transition. Meanwhile, literature has grown weak. The narrator notes, mockingly: People like to read, but do you see anyone discussing what they read?
Almeida points out the widening generational gap. The older generation fought against colonialism and fascism, but the young complain about their rights without understanding the cost of the freedom they enjoy. Does that sound familiar? It does, doesn't it? However, after independence, the same people stayed in power, preserving the structures (and even the colonial laws) under new symbols. So, no real change. Thus, the growing frustration among the younger generation.
One of the novel’s strongest meta-political points is that, in order to truly attack a society, one must attack its foundational myths. It's an idea that keeps circling periodically and is definitely a truth when it comes to colonialism and subjugating the native population, who is easier to control once their myths are taken away.
The secretary frequently takes things personally when they relate to the Poet, inserting himself into the Poet’s most intimate life, including his marriage, and often voicing jealousy or moral judgment. He’s also in love with the poet’s wife, which colors his narration with a subtle bitterness. While the public romanticizes the Poet for his literary genius and his political activity, the secretary, who lives in his house and knows how the Poet writes, is downplaying his talent. There's a passage where he compares the creative process to vomiting or diarrhea, which is both absurdly grotesque and hilarious. Also, the novel is filled with meta-commentary, with the secretary often questioning the meaning or relevance of events he’s just narrated. From this point of view, "O Meu Poeta" reminded me of Nabokov’s "Pale Fire", where the commentator slowly becomes the subject of the story.
I found the book brilliant, albeit sometimes difficult to read, due to its nonlinear narration. It mocks the myth of the heroic intellectual while at the same time speaking about the futility of trying to live with a certain integrity in a corrupt society.