In Defence of Politicians {In Spite of Themselves}

by Peter Riddell

In a timely and considered defense of the political process, Peter Riddell argues for a balance between popular participation and clear-cut decision making, underlining that political parties are necessary for strong government.

Peter Riddell is assistant editor of The Times and author of Hug Them Close: Blair, Clinton, Bush and the �Special Relationship.’

208 pages, Paperback

First published April 1, 2011

Reviews

[Stephen · Rating 2 out of 5]

As much as I would like to ignore the typographical errors in the book, the sheer number of them becomes tiresome and creates a feeling of carelessness - as if the book has been rushed out.

On the whole this book is okay. It has some interesting points to make in what are quite succinct and easy to read chapters. The author however constantly cross refers to other chapters (eg. "As I said in chapter 2..." or "as I will say in chapter 5"). Generally this leads to repetition and a feeling that the chapters weren't all that thought out. Again, I think the book may have been rushed out.

Finally the content is somewhat limited. It is solely concerned with Westminster and doesn't try to analyse and contrast devolved and local government. The last chapter tries to make recommendations but they are, on the whole, more concerned with better government and a more efficient parliament than about politicians themselves. There was also a lack of analysis of politicians themselves individually eg. Backgrounds and professions etc.

On the whole a good concept but could have been much better.

[Kenneth Millar]

Excellent book for its time. In a day and age when people are rather unfair on those who run our country, Riddell over looks there flaws and tells us what they do in difficult circumstances. However he does go as far as to justify the expenses scandal so be cautious when reading.